From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com,
famz@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
jcody@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, den@openvz.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] block/mirror: fix and improve do_sync_target_write
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 20:46:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180803174654.278336-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180803174654.278336-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Use bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area() instead of
bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area(), because of the following problems of
bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area():
1. Using HBitmap iterators we should carefully handle unaligned offset,
as first call to hbitmap_iter_next() may return a value less than
original offset (actually, it will be original offset rounded down to
bitmap granularity). This handling is not done in
do_sync_target_write().
2. bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area() handles unaligned max_offset
incorrectly:
look at the code:
if (max_offset == iter->bitmap->size) {
/* If max_offset points to the image end, round it up by the
* bitmap granularity */
gran_max_offset = ROUND_UP(max_offset, granularity);
} else {
gran_max_offset = max_offset;
}
ret = hbitmap_iter_next(&iter->hbi, false);
if (ret < 0 || ret + granularity > gran_max_offset) {
return false;
}
and assume that max_offset != iter->bitmap->size but still unaligned.
if 0 < ret < max_offset we found dirty area, but the function can
return false in this case (if ret + granularity > max_offset).
3. bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area() uses inefficient loop to find the end of
the dirty area. Let's use more efficient hbitmap_next_zero instead
(bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area() do so)
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
block/mirror.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
index b48c3f8cf5..d2806812c8 100644
--- a/block/mirror.c
+++ b/block/mirror.c
@@ -1167,25 +1167,22 @@ static void do_sync_target_write(MirrorBlockJob *job, MirrorMethod method,
uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
QEMUIOVector *qiov, int flags)
{
- BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter;
QEMUIOVector target_qiov;
- uint64_t dirty_offset;
- int dirty_bytes;
+ uint64_t dirty_offset = offset;
+ uint64_t dirty_bytes;
if (qiov) {
qemu_iovec_init(&target_qiov, qiov->niov);
}
- iter = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(job->dirty_bitmap);
- bdrv_set_dirty_iter(iter, offset);
-
while (true) {
bool valid_area;
int ret;
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_lock(job->dirty_bitmap);
- valid_area = bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area(iter, offset + bytes,
- &dirty_offset, &dirty_bytes);
+ valid_area = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area(
+ job->dirty_bitmap, &dirty_offset,
+ MIN(offset + bytes, dirty_offset + INT_MAX), &dirty_bytes);
if (!valid_area) {
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_unlock(job->dirty_bitmap);
break;
@@ -1241,9 +1238,10 @@ static void do_sync_target_write(MirrorBlockJob *job, MirrorMethod method,
break;
}
}
+
+ dirty_offset += dirty_bytes;
}
- bdrv_dirty_iter_free(iter);
if (qiov) {
qemu_iovec_destroy(&target_qiov);
}
--
2.11.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-03 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 17:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] dirty-bitmap: rewrite bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-08-03 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] dirty-bitmap: improve bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-08-03 18:32 ` Eric Blake
2018-08-03 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] dirty-bitmap: add bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-08-03 18:03 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-08-03 17:46 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2018-08-03 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] Revert "block/dirty-bitmap: Add bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area" Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-08-03 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] Revert "test-hbitmap: Add non-advancing iter_next tests" Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-08-03 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] Revert "hbitmap: Add @advance param to hbitmap_iter_next()" Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-08-03 19:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] dirty-bitmap: rewrite bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180803174654.278336-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).