* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nvme: simplify code around completion
@ 2018-08-13 14:43 Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-14 2:44 ` Fam Zheng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2018-08-13 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: famz, qemu-block
nvme_poll_queues is already protected by q->lock, and
AIO callbacks are invoked outside the AioContext lock.
So remove the acquire/release pair in nvme_handle_event.
Remove unnecessary variable in in nvme_poll_cb.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
block/nvme.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c
index 6f71122bf5..df2e16fabe 100644
--- a/block/nvme.c
+++ b/block/nvme.c
@@ -489,10 +489,8 @@ static void nvme_handle_event(EventNotifier *n)
BDRVNVMeState *s = container_of(n, BDRVNVMeState, irq_notifier);
trace_nvme_handle_event(s);
- aio_context_acquire(s->aio_context);
event_notifier_test_and_clear(n);
nvme_poll_queues(s);
- aio_context_release(s->aio_context);
}
static bool nvme_add_io_queue(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
@@ -539,11 +537,9 @@ static bool nvme_poll_cb(void *opaque)
{
EventNotifier *e = opaque;
BDRVNVMeState *s = container_of(e, BDRVNVMeState, irq_notifier);
- bool progress = false;
trace_nvme_poll_cb(s);
- progress = nvme_poll_queues(s);
- return progress;
+ return nvme_poll_queues(s);
}
static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *device, int namespace,
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nvme: simplify code around completion
2018-08-13 14:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nvme: simplify code around completion Paolo Bonzini
@ 2018-08-14 2:44 ` Fam Zheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fam Zheng @ 2018-08-14 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-block
On Mon, 08/13 16:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> nvme_poll_queues is already protected by q->lock, and
> AIO callbacks are invoked outside the AioContext lock.
> So remove the acquire/release pair in nvme_handle_event.
>
> Remove unnecessary variable in in nvme_poll_cb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/nvme.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c
> index 6f71122bf5..df2e16fabe 100644
> --- a/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/block/nvme.c
> @@ -489,10 +489,8 @@ static void nvme_handle_event(EventNotifier *n)
> BDRVNVMeState *s = container_of(n, BDRVNVMeState, irq_notifier);
>
> trace_nvme_handle_event(s);
> - aio_context_acquire(s->aio_context);
> event_notifier_test_and_clear(n);
> nvme_poll_queues(s);
> - aio_context_release(s->aio_context);
> }
>
> static bool nvme_add_io_queue(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
> @@ -539,11 +537,9 @@ static bool nvme_poll_cb(void *opaque)
> {
> EventNotifier *e = opaque;
> BDRVNVMeState *s = container_of(e, BDRVNVMeState, irq_notifier);
> - bool progress = false;
>
> trace_nvme_poll_cb(s);
> - progress = nvme_poll_queues(s);
> - return progress;
> + return nvme_poll_queues(s);
> }
>
> static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *device, int namespace,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Could you please split it into two patches? Because the significance of the two
hunks feels overwhelmingly imbalanced to me. :)
Fam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-14 2:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-13 14:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nvme: simplify code around completion Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-14 2:44 ` Fam Zheng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).