From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] nvme: correct locking around completion
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 14:45:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180814064519.GI7549@lemon.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180814062739.19640-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Tue, 08/14 08:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> nvme_poll_queues is already protected by q->lock, and
> AIO callbacks are invoked outside the AioContext lock.
> So remove the acquire/release pair in nvme_handle_event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/nvme.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c
> index 6f71122bf5..42116907ed 100644
> --- a/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/block/nvme.c
> @@ -489,10 +489,8 @@ static void nvme_handle_event(EventNotifier *n)
> BDRVNVMeState *s = container_of(n, BDRVNVMeState, irq_notifier);
>
> trace_nvme_handle_event(s);
> - aio_context_acquire(s->aio_context);
> event_notifier_test_and_clear(n);
> nvme_poll_queues(s);
> - aio_context_release(s->aio_context);
> }
>
> static bool nvme_add_io_queue(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
This patch and the other
[PATCH v2] nvme: simplify code around completion
only differ in subject. Which one to ignore? :)
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-14 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-14 6:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] nvme: correct locking around completion Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-14 6:45 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2018-08-14 8:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-09 19:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2018-10-10 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-11 2:56 ` Fam Zheng
2018-10-11 2:58 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180814064519.GI7549@lemon.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).