From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49279) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpvCw-00079J-9d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 08:47:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpvCq-00018f-R1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 08:47:25 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:50602 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpvCq-00017D-E2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 08:47:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:47:16 +0200 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20180815144716.2ef626b0@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20180810153223.28409-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20180810153223.28409-7-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20180813110744.3d0ee400@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 6/6] tpm: add ACPI memory clear interface List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6k=?= Lureau Cc: Eduardo Habkost , Stefan Berger , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , QEMU , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:02:06 +0200 Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > Hi > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:09 AM Igor Mammedov wrot= e: > > > > On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:32:23 +0200 > > Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > > =20 > > > This allows to pass the last failing test from the Windows HLK TPM 2.0 > > > TCG PPI 1.3 tests. > > > > > > The interface is described in the "TCG Platform Reset Attack > > > Mitigation Specification", chapter 6 "ACPI _DSM Function". According > > > to Laszlo, it's not so easy to implement in OVMF, he suggested to do > > > it in qemu instead. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > > > --- > > > hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.h | 2 ++ > > > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++ > > > hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 1 + > > > hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 1 + > > > docs/specs/tpm.txt | 2 ++ > > > hw/tpm/trace-events | 3 +++ > > > 7 files changed, 78 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.h b/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.h > > > index f6458bf87e..3239751e9f 100644 > > > --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.h > > > +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.h > > > @@ -23,4 +23,6 @@ typedef struct TPMPPI { > > > bool tpm_ppi_init(TPMPPI *tpmppi, struct MemoryRegion *m, > > > hwaddr addr, Object *obj, Error **errp); > > > > > > +void tpm_ppi_reset(TPMPPI *tpmppi); > > > + > > > #endif /* TPM_TPM_PPI_H */ > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > > > index c5e9a6e11d..271c7240dc 100644 > > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > > > @@ -1824,6 +1824,13 @@ build_tpm_ppi(TPMIf *tpm, Aml *dev) > > > pprq =3D aml_name("PPRQ"); > > > pprm =3D aml_name("PPRM"); > > > > > > + aml_append(dev, > > > + aml_operation_region("TPP3", AML_SYSTEM_MEMORY, > > > + aml_int(TPM_PPI_ADDR_BASE + 0x20= 0), > > > + 0x1)); > > > + field =3D aml_field("TPP3", AML_BYTE_ACC, AML_NOLOCK, AML_PRESER= VE); > > > + aml_append(field, aml_named_field("MOVV", 8)); > > > + aml_append(dev, field); > > > /* > > > * DerefOf in Windows is broken with SYSTEM_MEMORY. Use a dynam= ic > > > * operation region inside of a method for getting FUNC[op]. > > > @@ -2166,7 +2173,46 @@ build_tpm_ppi(TPMIf *tpm, Aml *dev) > > > aml_append(ifctx, aml_return(aml_buffer(1, zerobyte))); > > > } > > > aml_append(method, ifctx); > > > + > > > + ifctx =3D aml_if( > > > + aml_equal(uuid, > > > + aml_touuid("376054ED-CC13-4675-901C-4756D7F2D4= 5D"))); > > > + { > > > + /* standard DSM query function */ > > > + ifctx2 =3D aml_if(aml_equal(function, zero)); > > > + { > > > + uint8_t byte_list[1] =3D { 0x03 }; > > > + aml_append(ifctx2, aml_return(aml_buffer(1, byte_lis= t))); > > > + } > > > + aml_append(ifctx, ifctx2); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * TCG Platform Reset Attack Mitigation Specification 1.= 0 Ch.6 > > > + * > > > + * Arg 2 (Integer): Function Index =3D 1 > > > + * Arg 3 (Package): Arguments =3D Package: Type: Integer > > > + * Operation Value of the Request > > > + * Returns: Type: Integer > > > + * 0: Success > > > + * 1: General Failure > > > + */ > > > + ifctx2 =3D aml_if(aml_equal(function, one)); > > > + { > > > + aml_append(ifctx2, > > > + aml_store(aml_derefof(aml_index(arguments= , zero)), > > > + op)); > > > + { > > > + aml_append(ifctx2, aml_store(op, aml_name("MOVV"= ))); > > > + > > > + /* 0: success */ > > > + aml_append(ifctx2, aml_return(zero)); > > > + } > > > + } > > > + aml_append(ifctx, ifctx2); > > > + } > > > + aml_append(method, ifctx); > > > } > > > + > > > aml_append(dev, method); > > > } > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c > > > index b243222fd6..48f6a716ad 100644 > > > --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c > > > +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c > > > @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ static void tpm_crb_reset(void *dev) > > > { > > > CRBState *s =3D CRB(dev); > > > > > > + tpm_ppi_reset(&s->ppi); > > > tpm_backend_reset(s->tpmbe); > > > > > > memset(s->regs, 0, sizeof(s->regs)); > > > diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c > > > index 8b46b9dd4b..dbfe342ca2 100644 > > > --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c > > > +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c > > > @@ -16,8 +16,30 @@ > > > #include "qapi/error.h" > > > #include "cpu.h" > > > #include "sysemu/memory_mapping.h" > > > +#include "sysemu/reset.h" > > > #include "migration/vmstate.h" > > > #include "tpm_ppi.h" > > > +#include "trace.h" > > > + > > > +void tpm_ppi_reset(TPMPPI *tpmppi) > > > +{ > > > + char *ptr =3D memory_region_get_ram_ptr(&tpmppi->ram); > > > + > > > + if (ptr[0x200] & 0x1) { > > > + GuestPhysBlockList guest_phys_blocks; > > > + GuestPhysBlock *block; > > > + > > > + guest_phys_blocks_init(&guest_phys_blocks); > > > + guest_phys_blocks_append(&guest_phys_blocks); > > > + QTAILQ_FOREACH(block, &guest_phys_blocks.head, next) { > > > + trace_tpm_ppi_memset(block->host_addr, > > > + block->target_end - block->target_start= ); > > > + memset(block->host_addr, 0, > > > + block->target_end - block->target_start); > > > + } > > > + guest_phys_blocks_free(&guest_phys_blocks); > > > + } > > > +} > > > > > > bool tpm_ppi_init(TPMPPI *tpmppi, struct MemoryRegion *m, > > > hwaddr addr, Object *obj, Error **errp) > > > @@ -27,5 +49,6 @@ bool tpm_ppi_init(TPMPPI *tpmppi, struct MemoryRegi= on *m, > > > vmstate_register_ram(&tpmppi->ram, DEVICE(obj)); > > > > > > memory_region_add_subregion(m, addr, &tpmppi->ram); > > > + > > > return true; > > > } > > > diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c > > > index 70432ffe8b..d9bfa956cc 100644 > > > --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c > > > +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis.c > > > @@ -868,6 +868,7 @@ static void tpm_tis_reset(DeviceState *dev) > > > s->be_buffer_size =3D MIN(tpm_backend_get_buffer_size(s->be_driv= er), > > > TPM_TIS_BUFFER_MAX); > > > > > > + tpm_ppi_reset(&s->ppi); > > > tpm_backend_reset(s->be_driver); > > > > > > s->active_locty =3D TPM_TIS_NO_LOCALITY; > > > diff --git a/docs/specs/tpm.txt b/docs/specs/tpm.txt > > > index f3b7615161..54a3e1e4c5 100644 > > > --- a/docs/specs/tpm.txt > > > +++ b/docs/specs/tpm.txt > > > @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ layout: > > > +----------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------= ------+ > > > | next_step| 0x1 | 0x159 | Operation to execute after reboot by= | > > > | | | | firmware. Used by firmware. = | > > > + +----------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------= ------+ > > > + | movv | 0x1 | 0x200 | Memory overwrite variable = | > > > +----------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------= ------+ =20 > > why 0x200 and not 0x15a ? > > =20 >=20 > I thought it would be better to leave some room for PPI, but that > probably doesn't help much. Let's move it to 0x15a. >=20 > > Btw why TPM_PPI_ADDR_SIZE is 0x400 and excess bytes aren't documented a= nywhere? =20 >=20 > I guess for the same reason, Stefan wanted to have some room for > future changes. Is that a problem? It's ok to have some room reserved if there are plans to use it in future, I'd just suggest to document it to avoid the same question over again. Also low memory address space is quite limited so it would be better to reserve only necessary amount and no more than that. >=20 > Stefan, can you confirm? > > > > > > The following values are supported for the 'func' field. They cor= respond > > > diff --git a/hw/tpm/trace-events b/hw/tpm/trace-events > > > index 25bee0cecf..920d32ad55 100644 > > > --- a/hw/tpm/trace-events > > > +++ b/hw/tpm/trace-events > > > @@ -51,3 +51,6 @@ tpm_tis_mmio_write_init_abort(void) "Initiating abo= rt" > > > tpm_tis_mmio_write_lowering_irq(void) "Lowering IRQ" > > > tpm_tis_mmio_write_data2send(uint32_t value, unsigned size) "Data to= send to TPM: 0x%08x (size=3D%d)" > > > tpm_tis_pre_save(uint8_t locty, uint32_t rw_offset) "locty: %d, rw_o= ffset =3D %u" > > > + > > > +# hw/tpm/tpm_ppi.c > > > +tpm_ppi_memset(uint8_t *ptr, size_t size) "memset: %p %zu" =20 > > > > =20 >=20 >=20