From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>,
robert.hu@intel.com, rth@twiddle.net, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jingqi.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] kvm: Add support to KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST and KVM_GET_MSRS system ioctl
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:36:32 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180823173632.GN3778@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f59a30a4-6415-3c15-a3c1-5769eee04ad6@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 07:28:25PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 23/08/2018 19:11, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >>> We don't want QEMU to refuse to run if the kernel doesn't have
> >>> KVM_CAP_GET_MSR_FEATURES. We can treat missing capability as
> >>> equivalent to returning an empty list of MSRs.
> >> Yes. I'll let caller (kvm_arch_init) ignore the return value but a
> >> simple warning.
> > Warnings tend to be ignored and are generally a sign that QEMU
> > isn't doing the right thing. Sometimes we have no choice, but I
> > don't think that's the case here.
> >
> > As far as I can see, we have only two possibilities here:
> > 1) The host can run a VM that behaves exactly as requested on the
> > command-line (no warning required).
> > 2) The host can't run the requested configuration (fatal error,
> > not a warning).
>
> Right, but if KVM_CAP_GET_MSR_FEATURES is not available I guess you can
> assume the MSRs to be zero for everything except "-cpu host".
Yes, that would be simplest way to implement the above. Then
QEMU would refuse to run if the feature was part of the requested
configuration (2), or not care at all because the feature was not
set in the configuration (1).
But I'm not sure I follow the suggestion to not consider the MSR
to be zero on "-cpu host". If we don't need and KVM-side code to
support a given MSR feature, we can enable it on all models. IF
we need KVM-side code, we can't enable it even on "-cpu host".
This is not different from CPUID-based features.
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-23 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-10 14:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] x86: QEMU side support on MSR based features Robert Hoo
2018-08-10 14:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] x86: Data structure changes to support " Robert Hoo
2018-08-17 3:10 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-18 3:10 ` Robert Hoo
2018-08-18 5:48 ` Robert Hoo
2018-08-18 7:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-17 15:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-17 15:55 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-17 17:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-17 17:48 ` [Qemu-devel] X86CPU "feature-words" property on QEMU (was Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] x86: Data structure changes to support MSR based) features Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-17 17:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-17 18:10 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-10 14:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] kvm: Add support to KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST and KVM_GET_MSRS system ioctl Robert Hoo
2018-08-17 13:18 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-18 7:27 ` Robert Hoo
2018-08-18 15:05 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-23 6:28 ` Robert Hoo
2018-08-23 17:11 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-23 17:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-23 17:36 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2018-08-23 20:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-25 17:27 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-30 4:22 ` Robert Hoo
2018-08-30 18:28 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-10 14:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] Change other funcitons referring to feature_word_info[] Robert Hoo
2018-08-10 15:17 ` Eric Blake
2018-08-14 10:06 ` Robert Hoo
2018-08-17 13:28 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-18 9:01 ` Robert Hoo
2018-08-18 15:10 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-08-17 15:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-18 12:53 ` Robert Hoo
2018-09-05 5:47 ` Robert Hoo
2018-09-05 14:10 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-09-05 15:32 ` Eric Blake
2018-09-05 16:44 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-09-05 17:41 ` Eric Blake
2018-09-06 6:00 ` Hu, Robert
2018-09-10 17:38 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-09-11 1:44 ` Robert Hoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180823173632.GN3778@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jingqi.liu@intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).