From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
berrange@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix socket chardev regression
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:45:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824034517.GF24044@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180823143125.16767-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 04:31:20PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In commit 25679e5d58e "chardev: tcp: postpone async connection setup"
> (and its follow up 99f2f54174a59), Peter moved chardev socket
> connection to machine_done event. However, chardev created later will
> no longer attempt to connect, and chardev created in tests do not have
> machine_done event (breaking some of vhost-user-test).
>
> The goal was to move the "connect" source to the chardev frontend
> context (the monitor thread context in his case). chr->gcontext is set
> with qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(). But there is no guarantee that the
> function will be called in general, so we can't delay connection until
> then: the chardev should still attempt to connect during open(), using
> the main context.
>
> An alternative would be to specify the iothread during chardev
> creation. Setting up monitor OOB would be quite different too, it
> would take the same iothread as argument.
>
> 99f2f54174a595e is also a bit problematic, since it will behave
> differently before and after machine_done (the first case gives a
> chance to use a different context reliably, the second looks racy)
>
> In the end, I am not sure this is all necessary, as chardev callbacks
> are called after qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(), at which point the
> context of sources are updated. In "char-socket: update all ioc
> handlers when changing context", I moved also the hup handler to the
> updated context. So unless the main thread is already stuck, we can
> setup a different context for the chardev at that time. Or not?
>
> v2:
> - fix a random socket chardev test failure
I have no problem on patch 3-5, but aren't patch 1-2 still breaking
the context switch of chardev? Or did I misunderstood?
Regards,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-24 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 14:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix socket chardev regression Marc-André Lureau
2018-08-23 14:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] Revert "chardev: tcp: postpone TLS work until machine done" Marc-André Lureau
2018-08-23 14:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] Revert "chardev: tcp: postpone async connection setup" Marc-André Lureau
2018-08-23 14:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] char-socket: update all ioc handlers when changing context Marc-André Lureau
2018-08-23 14:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] test-char: fix random socket test failure Marc-André Lureau
2018-09-11 13:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-23 14:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] test-char: add socket reconnect test Marc-André Lureau
2018-08-24 3:45 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2018-08-24 8:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix socket chardev regression Marc-André Lureau
2018-08-24 8:44 ` Peter Xu
2018-08-24 8:51 ` Marc-André Lureau
2018-08-24 9:12 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180824034517.GF24044@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).