From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxIw0-00041S-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 17:32:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxIvx-0004Gu-C3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 17:32:28 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:36247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxIvw-0004FR-SG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 17:32:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:32:20 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20180904213220.GA1850@flamenco> References: <20180903171831.15446-1-cota@braap.org> <20180903171831.15446-3-cota@braap.org> <20180904173734.GA18515@kermit-br-ibm-com> <20180904193538.GA30725@flamenco> <20180904205631.GB18515@kermit-br-ibm-com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180904205631.GB18515@kermit-br-ibm-com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] test-rcu-list: avoid torn accesses to n_reclaims and n_nodes_removed List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Eduardo Habkost , Peter Crosthwaite On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 17:56:31 -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote: > The explanations you provided made a lot of difference on understanding the why > of your patch. Thank you! Glad that helped! > Is it possible to enhance commit message and add the explanations? If I end up submitting a v2 of this series due to code-related changes, then I'll expand this patch's commit message. Thanks, E.