From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzNK7-00069j-CD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzNK2-00027A-Lq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:54 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:34461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzNK2-00025U-7N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:47 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20180910143747.GB19941@flamenco> References: <20180908191735.22861-1-cota@braap.org> <20180908191735.22861-3-cota@braap.org> <87a7opd3br.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87a7opd3br.fsf@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] tests: add floating point tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Aurelien Jarno , Richard Henderson , Laurent Vivier On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:00:56 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > Emilio G. Cota writes: > > diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include > > index 87c81d1dcc..363f133101 100644 > > --- a/tests/Makefile.include > > +++ b/tests/Makefile.include > > @@ -657,6 +657,9 @@ tests/qht-bench$(EXESUF): tests/qht-bench.o $(test-util-obj-y) > > tests/test-bufferiszero$(EXESUF): tests/test-bufferiszero.o $(test-util-obj-y) > > tests/atomic_add-bench$(EXESUF): tests/atomic_add-bench.o $(test-util-obj-y) > > > > +tests/fp/%: > > + $(MAKE) -C $(dir $@) $(notdir $@) > > + > > This isn't enough to cause the build to be included in make check or > indeed be run. Perhaps that should be included in a new patch in the > series? Yes I figured we should fix the reported errors first -- otherwise we'll knowingly break the integration tests. Emilio