From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40599) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0llN-0004Ty-Eh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 06:55:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0llK-0000r2-9K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 06:55:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0llK-0000pL-3a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 06:55:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:55:30 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann Message-ID: <20180914105530.nxpfaqgegyktdpcp@sirius.home.kraxel.org> References: <20180913112205.3252-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180913112205.3252-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhost-user: define conventions for vhost-user backends List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, Daniel P =?utf-8?B?LiBCZXJyYW5nw6k=?= , Changpeng Liu , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , Felipe Franciosi , Gonglei , Maxime Coquelin , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Victor Kaplansky Hi, > +* --pidfile=PATH > + > +Write the process id (PID) to the given file PATH. This is mostly > +useful if the backend daemonize/fork itself. Is there any reason to daemonize itself? If not: shoud we disallow it and drop the --pidfile switch? If yes: should we add a --daemonize switch then to control whenever the process daemonizes itself? Otherwise the conventions look good to me. cheers, Gerd