qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] test-replication: Lock AioContext around blk_unref()
Date: Mon,  1 Oct 2018 16:32:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181001143218.17069-1-kwolf@redhat.com> (raw)

Recently, the test case has started failing because some job related
functions want to drop the AioContext lock even though it hasn't been
taken:

    (gdb) bt
    #0  0x00007f51c067c9fb in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
    #1  0x00007f51c067e77d in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
    #2  0x0000558c9d5dde7b in error_exit (err=<optimized out>, msg=msg@entry=0x558c9d6fe120 <__func__.18373> "qemu_mutex_unlock_impl") at util/qemu-thread-posix.c:36
    #3  0x0000558c9d6b5263 in qemu_mutex_unlock_impl (mutex=mutex@entry=0x558c9f3999a0, file=file@entry=0x558c9d6fd36f "util/async.c", line=line@entry=516) at util/qemu-thread-posix.c:96
    #4  0x0000558c9d6b0565 in aio_context_release (ctx=ctx@entry=0x558c9f399940) at util/async.c:516
    #5  0x0000558c9d5eb3da in job_completed_txn_abort (job=0x558c9f68e640) at job.c:738
    #6  0x0000558c9d5eb227 in job_finish_sync (job=0x558c9f68e640, finish=finish@entry=0x558c9d5eb8d0 <job_cancel_err>, errp=errp@entry=0x0) at job.c:986
    #7  0x0000558c9d5eb8ee in job_cancel_sync (job=<optimized out>) at job.c:941
    #8  0x0000558c9d64d853 in replication_close (bs=<optimized out>) at block/replication.c:148
    #9  0x0000558c9d5e5c9f in bdrv_close (bs=0x558c9f41b020) at block.c:3420
    #10 bdrv_delete (bs=0x558c9f41b020) at block.c:3629
    #11 bdrv_unref (bs=0x558c9f41b020) at block.c:4685
    #12 0x0000558c9d62a3f3 in blk_remove_bs (blk=blk@entry=0x558c9f42a7c0) at block/block-backend.c:783
    #13 0x0000558c9d62a667 in blk_delete (blk=0x558c9f42a7c0) at block/block-backend.c:402
    #14 blk_unref (blk=0x558c9f42a7c0) at block/block-backend.c:457
    #15 0x0000558c9d5dfcea in test_secondary_stop () at tests/test-replication.c:478
    #16 0x00007f51c1f13178 in g_test_run_suite_internal () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
    #17 0x00007f51c1f1337b in g_test_run_suite_internal () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
    #18 0x00007f51c1f1337b in g_test_run_suite_internal () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
    #19 0x00007f51c1f13552 in g_test_run_suite () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
    #20 0x00007f51c1f13571 in g_test_run () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
    #21 0x0000558c9d5de31f in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at tests/test-replication.c:581

It is yet unclear whether this should really be considered a bug in the
test case or whether blk_unref() should work for callers that haven't
taken the AioContext lock, but in order to fix the build tests quickly,
just take the AioContext lock around blk_unref().

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
 tests/test-replication.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/test-replication.c b/tests/test-replication.c
index c8165ae954..f085d1993a 100644
--- a/tests/test-replication.c
+++ b/tests/test-replication.c
@@ -207,13 +207,17 @@ static BlockBackend *start_primary(void)
 static void teardown_primary(void)
 {
     BlockBackend *blk;
+    AioContext *ctx;
 
     /* remove P_ID */
     blk = blk_by_name(P_ID);
     assert(blk);
 
+    ctx = blk_get_aio_context(blk);
+    aio_context_acquire(ctx);
     monitor_remove_blk(blk);
     blk_unref(blk);
+    aio_context_release(ctx);
 }
 
 static void test_primary_read(void)
@@ -365,20 +369,27 @@ static void teardown_secondary(void)
 {
     /* only need to destroy two BBs */
     BlockBackend *blk;
+    AioContext *ctx;
 
     /* remove S_LOCAL_DISK_ID */
     blk = blk_by_name(S_LOCAL_DISK_ID);
     assert(blk);
 
+    ctx = blk_get_aio_context(blk);
+    aio_context_acquire(ctx);
     monitor_remove_blk(blk);
     blk_unref(blk);
+    aio_context_release(ctx);
 
     /* remove S_ID */
     blk = blk_by_name(S_ID);
     assert(blk);
 
+    ctx = blk_get_aio_context(blk);
+    aio_context_acquire(ctx);
     monitor_remove_blk(blk);
     blk_unref(blk);
+    aio_context_release(ctx);
 }
 
 static void test_secondary_read(void)
-- 
2.13.6

             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-01 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-01 14:32 Kevin Wolf [this message]
2018-10-01 15:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] test-replication: Lock AioContext around blk_unref() Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-01 16:03   ` Kevin Wolf
2018-10-01 16:13     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181001143218.17069-1-kwolf@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).