From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9d4T-0005Ft-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 17:28:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9cyi-000866-Rs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 17:22:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]:34195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9cyi-00084z-E0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 17:22:12 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id f18-v6so10610954plr.1 for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 14:22:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Henderson Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700 Message-Id: <20181008212205.17752-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <20181008212205.17752-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> References: <20181008212205.17752-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/10] target/arm: Fix aarch64_sve_change_el wrt EL0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org At present we assert: arm_el_is_aa64: Assertion `el >= 1 && el <= 3' failed. The comment in arm_el_is_aa64 explains why asking about EL0 without extra information is impossible. Add an extra argument to provide it from the surrounding context. Fixes: 0ab5953b00b3 Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- target/arm/cpu.h | 7 +++++-- target/arm/helper.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- target/arm/op_helper.c | 6 +++++- 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h index 3a2aff1192..54362ddce8 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.h +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h @@ -911,10 +911,13 @@ int arm_cpu_write_elf32_note(WriteCoreDumpFunction f, CPUState *cs, int aarch64_cpu_gdb_read_register(CPUState *cpu, uint8_t *buf, int reg); int aarch64_cpu_gdb_write_register(CPUState *cpu, uint8_t *buf, int reg); void aarch64_sve_narrow_vq(CPUARMState *env, unsigned vq); -void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int old_el, int new_el); +void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int old_el, + int new_el, bool el0_a64); #else static inline void aarch64_sve_narrow_vq(CPUARMState *env, unsigned vq) { } -static inline void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int o, int n) { } +static inline void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int o, + int n, bool a) +{ } #endif target_ulong do_arm_semihosting(CPUARMState *env); diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index c83f7c1109..0efbb5c76c 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -8374,7 +8374,11 @@ static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(CPUState *cs) unsigned int new_mode = aarch64_pstate_mode(new_el, true); unsigned int cur_el = arm_current_el(env); - aarch64_sve_change_el(env, cur_el, new_el); + /* + * Note that new_el can never be 0. If cur_el is 0, then + * el0_a64 is is_a64(), else el0_a64 is ignored. + */ + aarch64_sve_change_el(env, cur_el, new_el, is_a64(env)); if (cur_el < new_el) { /* Entry vector offset depends on whether the implemented EL @@ -12791,9 +12795,11 @@ void aarch64_sve_narrow_vq(CPUARMState *env, unsigned vq) /* * Notice a change in SVE vector size when changing EL. */ -void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int old_el, int new_el) +void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int old_el, + int new_el, bool el0_a64) { int old_len, new_len; + bool old_a64, new_a64; /* Nothing to do if no SVE. */ if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_SVE)) { @@ -12817,9 +12823,11 @@ void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int old_el, int new_el) * we already have the correct register contents when encountering the * vq0->vq0 transition between EL0->EL1. */ - old_len = (arm_el_is_aa64(env, old_el) && !sve_exception_el(env, old_el) + old_a64 = old_el ? arm_el_is_aa64(env, old_el) : el0_a64; + old_len = (old_a64 && !sve_exception_el(env, old_el) ? sve_zcr_len_for_el(env, old_el) : 0); - new_len = (arm_el_is_aa64(env, new_el) && !sve_exception_el(env, new_el) + new_a64 = new_el ? arm_el_is_aa64(env, new_el) : el0_a64; + new_len = (new_a64 && !sve_exception_el(env, new_el) ? sve_zcr_len_for_el(env, new_el) : 0); /* When changing vector length, clear inaccessible state. */ diff --git a/target/arm/op_helper.c b/target/arm/op_helper.c index fb15a13e6c..d915579712 100644 --- a/target/arm/op_helper.c +++ b/target/arm/op_helper.c @@ -1101,7 +1101,11 @@ void HELPER(exception_return)(CPUARMState *env) "AArch64 EL%d PC 0x%" PRIx64 "\n", cur_el, new_el, env->pc); } - aarch64_sve_change_el(env, cur_el, new_el); + /* + * Note that cur_el can never be 0. If new_el is 0, then + * el0_a64 is return_to_aa64, else el0_a64 is ignored. + */ + aarch64_sve_change_el(env, cur_el, new_el, return_to_aa64); qemu_mutex_lock_iothread(); arm_call_el_change_hook(arm_env_get_cpu(env)); -- 2.17.1