From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAD3x-0004s1-4d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:54:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAD3s-0003BJ-4K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:54:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:53:42 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20181010135342.28e756d6.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1bad0d3d-4c6e-4330-b0f1-90a411edb27f@linux.ibm.com> References: <20181009175226.22138-1-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20181009175226.22138-4-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1bad0d3d-4c6e-4330-b0f1-90a411edb27f@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v10 3/6] s390x/kvm: enable AP instruction interpretation for guest List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Halil Pasic Cc: Tony Krowiak , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, david@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, eskultet@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mimu@linux.ibm.com, Tony Krowiak , heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:38:51 +0200 Halil Pasic wrote: > On 10/09/2018 07:52 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote: > > +static void kvm_s390_configure_apie(bool interpret) > > +{ > > + uint64_t attr = interpret ? KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO_ENABLE_APIE : > > + KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO_DISABLE_APIE; > > + > > + if (kvm_vm_check_attr(kvm_state, KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO, attr)) { > > Not sure this check is necessary, and that the behavior if it fails > is intuitive, but whatever. It's not an uncommon pattern, and this is not a call where performance matters, so it's fine with me. > > > + kvm_s390_set_attr(attr); > > + } > > +} > > +