From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFQ9J-0001O3-BG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:53:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFQ9G-0002X8-1R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:53:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFQ9F-0002Tp-1s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:53:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:52:55 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20181024165231-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20181022183656.4902-1-sameo@linux.intel.com> <20181022183656.4902-19-sameo@linux.intel.com> <0f69efce-a104-00ae-ef8a-899aea0a801c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0f69efce-a104-00ae-ef8a-899aea0a801c@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/26] hw: acpi: Initial hardware-reduced support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Samuel Ortiz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:09:18AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 22/10/2018 20:36, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > We build a minimal set of ACPI hardware-reduced tables: XSDT, > > FADT, MADT and a DSDT pointed by a RSDP. > > The DSDT only contains one PCI host bridge for now. > > > > This API will be consumed by new x86 machine type but also potentially > > by the ARM virt one. > > > > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" > > Cc: Igor Mammedov > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz > > Do not include patches that essentially add dead code. It is nice to > have hardware-reduced support, but if you want to contribute it you need > to add a user as well, for example the ARM virt machine type. > > In fact, using it in the ARM virt machine type is a no-brainer, so doing > that change (even if it's not yet part of NEMU) would be an excellent > way to reduce your delta, without going through the processing of > convincing QEMU maintainers of the advantages of your new x86 machine type. > > Paolo Excellent point, thanks Paolo. -- MST