* [Qemu-devel] ping Re: [PATCH 0/2] replication: drop extra sync
[not found] <20180919124343.28206-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
@ 2018-10-11 15:40 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-10-31 9:30 ` [Qemu-devel] ping2 " Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy @ 2018-10-11 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: xiechanglong.d@gmail.com, wencongyang2@huawei.com,
mreitz@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com,
Denis Lunev, famz@redhat.com
ping
19.09.2018 15:43, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We finally implemented fleecing scheme, create a test case for it (222)
> and even made it safe (f8d59dfb40).
>
> However, fleecing is used inside block-replication long ago, and to make
> the scheme safe it uses direct interface to backup-job copy requests
> synchronization, which can be dropped now.
>
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
> block/replication: drop extra synchronization
> block/backup: drop unused synchronization interface
>
> include/block/block_backup.h | 13 ------------
> block/backup.c | 38 +++++++-----------------------------
> block/replication.c | 24 +----------------------
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Qemu-devel] ping2 Re: [PATCH 0/2] replication: drop extra sync
[not found] <20180919124343.28206-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
2018-10-11 15:40 ` [Qemu-devel] ping Re: [PATCH 0/2] replication: drop extra sync Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
@ 2018-10-31 9:30 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2018-11-06 17:17 ` Kevin Wolf
1 sibling, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy @ 2018-10-31 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: xiechanglong.d@gmail.com, wencongyang2@huawei.com,
mreitz@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com,
Denis Lunev, famz@redhat.com
ping2
Hi, it's a first step to backup refactoring and improving. Just get rid
of this extra and unnatural synchronization.
19.09.2018 15:43, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We finally implemented fleecing scheme, create a test case for it (222)
> and even made it safe (f8d59dfb40).
>
> However, fleecing is used inside block-replication long ago, and to make
> the scheme safe it uses direct interface to backup-job copy requests
> synchronization, which can be dropped now.
>
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
> block/replication: drop extra synchronization
> block/backup: drop unused synchronization interface
>
> include/block/block_backup.h | 13 ------------
> block/backup.c | 38 +++++++-----------------------------
> block/replication.c | 24 +----------------------
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread