From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/4] s390x/zpci: use hotplug_dev instead of looking up the host bridge
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 12:07:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181108120741.2e463fe2.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2c3c667-e04e-9498-c4d7-05eaeedf0a26@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:28:31 -0500
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 11/5/18 6:50 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 05.11.18 12:40, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/05/2018 12:37 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>> On 05.11.18 12:21, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:03:11 +0100
> >>>> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> We directly have it in our hands.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 ++--
> >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> >>>>> index 1eaae3aca6..68660eac74 100644
> >>>>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> >>>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> >>>>> @@ -814,9 +814,9 @@ static bool s390_pci_alloc_idx(S390pciState *s, S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev)
> >>>>> static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> >>>>> Error **errp)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> + S390pciState *s = S390_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(hotplug_dev);
> >>>>> PCIDevice *pdev = NULL;
> >>>>> S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev = NULL;
> >>>>> - S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb();
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE)) {
> >>>>> BusState *bus;
> >>>>> @@ -924,11 +924,11 @@ static void s390_pcihost_timer_cb(void *opaque)
> >>>>> static void s390_pcihost_unplug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> >>>>> Error **errp)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> + S390pciState *s = S390_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(hotplug_dev);
> >>>>> PCIDevice *pci_dev = NULL;
> >>>>> PCIBus *bus;
> >>>>> int32_t devfn;
> >>>>> S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev = NULL;
> >>>>> - S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb();
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE)) {
> >>>>> error_setg(errp, "PCI bridge hot unplug currently not supported");
> >>>>
> >>>> Not sure whether that is an improvement (s390_get_phb() caches the
> >>>> value, and is called from multiple other places as well.)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Looking up a variable that is directly passed as an argument doesn't
> >>> look clean to me.
> >>
> >> I think there was a reason for this caching, namely that qom resolution can
> >> be quite expensive. For the hotplug case this obviously does not matter but
> >> for all the other cases it might. So do we really want to have different
> >> places use different methods?
> >>
> >
> > Caching resolution is fine (as that is expensive), caching a downcast is
> > as far as I remember not necessary. Especially, as you said, for hotplug
> > handlers.
Yes, the complete QOM cast was the expensive thing AFAIR.
> >
> > Anyhow, if there are strong feelings to this change, I can drop this
> > patch. There are certainly more important things to do in zPCI hotplug code.
> >
> >
>
> Truthfully, I'm not in favor of one over the other. As long as the device handlers
> are consistent, I think either is fine.
I don't feel *that* strong about this change here, either :) Your call.
>
> However, it would be nice if at some point during plug we cache the PHB somewhere.
> That would be some sort of best-of-both-worlds approach.
Not sure if caching-from-a-downcast would be conceptionally clean. I'd
vote for either taking this patch or dropping it completely.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-08 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-05 11:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] s390x/zpci: some hotplug handler cleanups David Hildenbrand
2018-11-05 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/4] s390x/zpci: drop msix.available David Hildenbrand
2018-11-05 11:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-07 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Collin Walling
2018-11-08 10:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-05 11:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Huth
2018-11-12 17:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-05 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/4] s390x/zpci: use hotplug_dev instead of looking up the host bridge David Hildenbrand
2018-11-05 11:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-05 11:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-05 11:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-11-05 11:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-07 20:28 ` Collin Walling
2018-11-08 11:07 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-11-08 11:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-05 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 3/4] s390x/zpci: move some hotplug checks to the pre_plug handler David Hildenbrand
2018-11-05 11:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-07 19:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Collin Walling
2018-11-07 19:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-07 19:46 ` Collin Walling
2018-11-05 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 4/4] s390x/zpci: properly fail if the zPCI device cannot be created David Hildenbrand
2018-11-05 12:04 ` Thomas Huth
2018-11-05 12:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-05 12:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-08 11:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-07 20:15 ` Collin Walling
2018-11-08 13:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-08 13:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-12 17:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/4] s390x/zpci: some hotplug handler cleanups Cornelia Huck
2018-11-12 17:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-13 9:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-13 12:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181108120741.2e463fe2.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).