From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gM9nP-0007yc-Uu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 05:50:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gM9nO-0002IW-2g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 05:50:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:49:53 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20181112104953.GB11580@linux.fritz.box> References: <20181109221213.7310-1-crosa@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181109221213.7310-1-crosa@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Acceptance tests for qemu-img List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cleber Rosa Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Caio Carrara , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Eduardo Habkost Am 09.11.2018 um 23:12 hat Cleber Rosa geschrieben: > The initial goal of this RFC is to get feedback on tests not specific > to the QEMU main binary, but specific to other components such as > qemu-img. > > For this experiment, a small issue with the zero and negative number > of I/O operations given to the bench command was chosen. Any reason why this shouldn't be in qemu-iotests? Kevin