qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters
@ 2018-11-13 18:01 Richard Henderson
  2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] target/arm: Install ARMISARegisters from kvm host Richard Henderson
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2018-11-13 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: peter.maydell, qemu-arm

Facepalm.  I managed to not push the v3 changes anywhere,
so the v4 changes were done on top of v2.  Ho hum.

r~


Richard Henderson (4):
  target/arm: Install ARMISARegisters from kvm host
  target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm64
  target/arm: Introduce read_sys_reg32 for kvm32
  target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm32

 target/arm/kvm_arm.h |  1 +
 target/arm/kvm.c     |  1 +
 target/arm/kvm32.c   | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 target/arm/kvm64.c   | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] target/arm: Install ARMISARegisters from kvm host
  2018-11-13 18:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters Richard Henderson
@ 2018-11-13 18:01 ` Richard Henderson
  2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/4] target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm64 Richard Henderson
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2018-11-13 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: peter.maydell, qemu-arm

The ID registers are replacing (some of) the feature bits.
We need (some of) these values to determine the set of data
to be handled during migration.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/kvm_arm.h | 1 +
 target/arm/kvm.c     | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
index 21c0129da2..6393455b1d 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ void kvm_arm_destroy_scratch_host_vcpu(int *fdarray);
  * by asking the host kernel)
  */
 typedef struct ARMHostCPUFeatures {
+    ARMISARegisters isar;
     uint64_t features;
     uint32_t target;
     const char *dtb_compatible;
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c
index 09a86e2820..44dd0ce6ce 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm.c
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ void kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(ARMCPU *cpu)
 
     cpu->kvm_target = arm_host_cpu_features.target;
     cpu->dtb_compatible = arm_host_cpu_features.dtb_compatible;
+    cpu->isar = arm_host_cpu_features.isar;
     env->features = arm_host_cpu_features.features;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/4] target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm64
  2018-11-13 18:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters Richard Henderson
  2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] target/arm: Install ARMISARegisters from kvm host Richard Henderson
@ 2018-11-13 18:01 ` Richard Henderson
  2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/4] target/arm: Introduce read_sys_reg32 for kvm32 Richard Henderson
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2018-11-13 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: peter.maydell, qemu-arm

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/kvm64.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
index 46fbe6d8ff..0a502091e7 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
@@ -456,17 +456,40 @@ static inline void unset_feature(uint64_t *features, int feature)
     *features &= ~(1ULL << feature);
 }
 
+static int read_sys_reg32(int fd, uint32_t *pret, uint64_t id)
+{
+    uint64_t ret;
+    struct kvm_one_reg idreg = { .id = id, .addr = (uintptr_t)&ret };
+    int err;
+
+    assert((id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) == KVM_REG_SIZE_U64);
+    err = ioctl(fd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, &idreg);
+    if (err < 0) {
+        return -1;
+    }
+    *pret = ret;
+    return 0;
+}
+
+static int read_sys_reg64(int fd, uint64_t *pret, uint64_t id)
+{
+    struct kvm_one_reg idreg = { .id = id, .addr = (uintptr_t)pret };
+
+    assert((id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) == KVM_REG_SIZE_U64);
+    return ioctl(fd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, &idreg);
+}
+
 bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
 {
     /* Identify the feature bits corresponding to the host CPU, and
      * fill out the ARMHostCPUClass fields accordingly. To do this
      * we have to create a scratch VM, create a single CPU inside it,
      * and then query that CPU for the relevant ID registers.
-     * For AArch64 we currently don't care about ID registers at
-     * all; we just want to know the CPU type.
      */
     int fdarray[3];
     uint64_t features = 0;
+    int err;
+
     /* Old kernels may not know about the PREFERRED_TARGET ioctl: however
      * we know these will only support creating one kind of guest CPU,
      * which is its preferred CPU type. Fortunately these old kernels
@@ -487,8 +510,71 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
     ahcf->target = init.target;
     ahcf->dtb_compatible = "arm,arm-v8";
 
+    err = read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_aa64pfr0,
+                         ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 4, 0));
+    if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
+        /*
+         * Before v4.15, the kernel only exposed a limited number of system
+         * registers, not including any of the interesting AArch64 ID regs.
+         * For the most part we could leave these fields as zero with minimal
+         * effect, since this does not affect the values seen by the guest.
+         *
+         * However, it could cause problems down the line for QEMU,
+         * so provide a minimal v8.0 default.
+         *
+         * ??? Could read MIDR and use knowledge from cpu64.c.
+         * ??? Could map a page of memory into our temp guest and
+         *     run the tiniest of hand-crafted kernels to extract
+         *     the values seen by the guest.
+         * ??? Either of these sounds like too much effort just
+         *     to work around running a modern host kernel.
+         */
+        ahcf->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = 0x00000011; /* EL1&0, AArch64 only */
+        err = 0;
+    } else {
+        err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_aa64pfr1,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 4, 1));
+        err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_aa64isar0,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 6, 0));
+        err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_aa64isar1,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 6, 1));
+
+        /*
+         * Note that if AArch32 support is not present in the host,
+         * the AArch32 sysregs are present to be read, but will
+         * return UNKNOWN values.  This is neither better nor worse
+         * than skipping the reads and leaving 0, as we must avoid
+         * considering the values in every case.
+         */
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar0,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 2, 0));
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar1,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 2, 1));
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar2,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 2, 2));
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar3,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 2, 3));
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar4,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 2, 4));
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar5,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 2, 5));
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar6,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 2, 7));
+
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.mvfr0,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 3, 0));
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.mvfr1,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 3, 1));
+        err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.mvfr2,
+                              ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 3, 2));
+    }
+
     kvm_arm_destroy_scratch_host_vcpu(fdarray);
 
+    if (err < 0) {
+        return false;
+    }
+
    /* We can assume any KVM supporting CPU is at least a v8
      * with VFPv4+Neon; this in turn implies most of the other
      * feature bits.
-- 
2.17.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/4] target/arm: Introduce read_sys_reg32 for kvm32
  2018-11-13 18:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters Richard Henderson
  2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] target/arm: Install ARMISARegisters from kvm host Richard Henderson
  2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/4] target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm64 Richard Henderson
@ 2018-11-13 18:01 ` Richard Henderson
  2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/4] target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters " Richard Henderson
  2018-11-15 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters Peter Maydell
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2018-11-13 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: peter.maydell, qemu-arm

Assert that the value to be written is the correct size.
No change in functionality here, just mirroring the same
function from kvm64.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/kvm32.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/kvm32.c b/target/arm/kvm32.c
index cb3fb73a96..bc0badf53d 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm32.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm32.c
@@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ static inline void set_feature(uint64_t *features, int feature)
     *features |= 1ULL << feature;
 }
 
+static int read_sys_reg32(int fd, uint32_t *pret, uint64_t id)
+{
+    struct kvm_one_reg idreg = { .id = id, .addr = (uintptr_t)pret };
+
+    assert((id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) == KVM_REG_SIZE_U32);
+    return ioctl(fd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, &idreg);
+}
+
 bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
 {
     /* Identify the feature bits corresponding to the host CPU, and
@@ -35,9 +43,10 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
      * we have to create a scratch VM, create a single CPU inside it,
      * and then query that CPU for the relevant ID registers.
      */
-    int i, ret, fdarray[3];
+    int err = 0, fdarray[3];
     uint32_t midr, id_pfr0, mvfr1;
     uint64_t features = 0;
+
     /* Old kernels may not know about the PREFERRED_TARGET ioctl: however
      * we know these will only support creating one kind of guest CPU,
      * which is its preferred CPU type.
@@ -47,23 +56,6 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
         QEMU_KVM_ARM_TARGET_NONE
     };
     struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
-    struct kvm_one_reg idregs[] = {
-        {
-            .id = KVM_REG_ARM | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32
-            | ENCODE_CP_REG(15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
-            .addr = (uintptr_t)&midr,
-        },
-        {
-            .id = KVM_REG_ARM | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32
-            | ENCODE_CP_REG(15, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0),
-            .addr = (uintptr_t)&id_pfr0,
-        },
-        {
-            .id = KVM_REG_ARM | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32
-            | KVM_REG_ARM_VFP | KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_MVFR1,
-            .addr = (uintptr_t)&mvfr1,
-        },
-    };
 
     if (!kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(cpus_to_try, fdarray, &init)) {
         return false;
@@ -77,16 +69,15 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
      */
     ahcf->dtb_compatible = "arm,arm-v7";
 
-    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(idregs); i++) {
-        ret = ioctl(fdarray[2], KVM_GET_ONE_REG, &idregs[i]);
-        if (ret) {
-            break;
-        }
-    }
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &midr, ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 0, 0));
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &id_pfr0, ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 1, 0));
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &mvfr1,
+                          KVM_REG_ARM | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 |
+                          KVM_REG_ARM_VFP | KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_MVFR1);
 
     kvm_arm_destroy_scratch_host_vcpu(fdarray);
 
-    if (ret) {
+    if (err < 0) {
         return false;
     }
 
-- 
2.17.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/4] target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm32
  2018-11-13 18:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters Richard Henderson
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/4] target/arm: Introduce read_sys_reg32 for kvm32 Richard Henderson
@ 2018-11-13 18:01 ` Richard Henderson
  2018-11-15 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters Peter Maydell
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2018-11-13 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: peter.maydell, qemu-arm

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/kvm32.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/kvm32.c b/target/arm/kvm32.c
index bc0badf53d..bd51eb43c8 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm32.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm32.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
      * and then query that CPU for the relevant ID registers.
      */
     int err = 0, fdarray[3];
-    uint32_t midr, id_pfr0, mvfr1;
+    uint32_t midr, id_pfr0;
     uint64_t features = 0;
 
     /* Old kernels may not know about the PREFERRED_TARGET ioctl: however
@@ -71,9 +71,39 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
 
     err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &midr, ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 0, 0));
     err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &id_pfr0, ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 1, 0));
-    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &mvfr1,
+
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar0,
+                          ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 2, 0));
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar1,
+                          ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 2, 1));
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar2,
+                          ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 2, 2));
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar3,
+                          ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 2, 3));
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar4,
+                          ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 2, 4));
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar5,
+                          ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 2, 5));
+    if (read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_isar6,
+                       ARM_CP15_REG32(0, 0, 2, 7))) {
+        /*
+         * Older kernels don't support reading ID_ISAR6. This register was
+         * only introduced in ARMv8, so we can assume that it is zero on a
+         * CPU that a kernel this old is running on.
+         */
+        ahcf->isar.id_isar6 = 0;
+    }
+
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.mvfr0,
+                          KVM_REG_ARM | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 |
+                          KVM_REG_ARM_VFP | KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_MVFR0);
+    err |= read_sys_reg32(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.mvfr1,
                           KVM_REG_ARM | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 |
                           KVM_REG_ARM_VFP | KVM_REG_ARM_VFP_MVFR1);
+    /*
+     * FIXME: There is not yet a way to read MVFR2.
+     * Fortunately there is not yet anything in there that affects migration.
+     */
 
     kvm_arm_destroy_scratch_host_vcpu(fdarray);
 
@@ -95,13 +125,13 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
     if (extract32(id_pfr0, 12, 4) == 1) {
         set_feature(&features, ARM_FEATURE_THUMB2EE);
     }
-    if (extract32(mvfr1, 20, 4) == 1) {
+    if (extract32(ahcf->isar.mvfr1, 20, 4) == 1) {
         set_feature(&features, ARM_FEATURE_VFP_FP16);
     }
-    if (extract32(mvfr1, 12, 4) == 1) {
+    if (extract32(ahcf->isar.mvfr1, 12, 4) == 1) {
         set_feature(&features, ARM_FEATURE_NEON);
     }
-    if (extract32(mvfr1, 28, 4) == 1) {
+    if (extract32(ahcf->isar.mvfr1, 28, 4) == 1) {
         /* FMAC support implies VFPv4 */
         set_feature(&features, ARM_FEATURE_VFP4);
     }
-- 
2.17.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters
  2018-11-13 18:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters Richard Henderson
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/4] target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters " Richard Henderson
@ 2018-11-15 14:53 ` Peter Maydell
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2018-11-15 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: QEMU Developers, qemu-arm

On 13 November 2018 at 18:01, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
> Facepalm.  I managed to not push the v3 changes anywhere,
> so the v4 changes were done on top of v2.  Ho hum.
>
> r~
>

Applied v5 to target-arm.next for 3.1, thanks. (And tested on
both the aarch64 and the aarch32 systems that had problems
with earlier versions of the patchset.)

-- PMM

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-15 14:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-13 18:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters Richard Henderson
2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] target/arm: Install ARMISARegisters from kvm host Richard Henderson
2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/4] target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm64 Richard Henderson
2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/4] target/arm: Introduce read_sys_reg32 for kvm32 Richard Henderson
2018-11-13 18:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/4] target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters " Richard Henderson
2018-11-15 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters Peter Maydell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).