From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/13] file-posix: Audit for read/write 64-bit cleanness
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 20:03:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181115020334.1189829-11-eblake@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181115020334.1189829-1-eblake@redhat.com>
Any use of aio is inherently limited by size_t aio_nbytes in struct
aiocb. read() is similarly limited to size_t bytes, although in
practice, the ssize_t return means any read attempt on a 32-bit
platform for more than 2G will likely return a short read (if that
much memory was even available to begin with). And while preadv()
can technically read more than size_t bytes by use of more than one
iov, the fact that you can only pass a finite number of iov each of
which is limited to size_t bytes is a limiting factor.
While we already attempt other methods at populating a more reasonable
max_transfer limit in the cases where the kernel makes that
information available, it is important that we at least let the block
layer know about our hard limitation of size_t bytes (mainly
applicable to 32-bit compilation). At the same time, on 64-bit
platforms, that means we are now advertising that we don't have any
other unintended size-botching problems, if the block layer were to
start handing us requests larger than 2G.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
---
block/file-posix.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
index 48ad3bb372a..4b43ff8cb5c 100644
--- a/block/file-posix.c
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -1073,6 +1073,9 @@ static void raw_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
raw_probe_alignment(bs, s->fd, errp);
bs->bl.min_mem_alignment = s->buf_align;
bs->bl.opt_mem_alignment = MAX(s->buf_align, getpagesize());
+ if (!bs->bl.max_transfer) {
+ bs->bl.max_transfer = SIZE_MAX;
+ }
}
static int check_for_dasd(int fd)
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-15 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-15 2:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-4.0 00/13] block: byte-based blocking read/write Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/13] qcow2: Prefer byte-based calls into bs->file Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/13] vdi: Switch to byte-based calls Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/13] vvfat: " Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/13] block: Removed unused sector-based blocking I/O Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/13] block: Switch to 64-bit bl.max_transfer Eric Blake
2018-11-15 15:45 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-11-15 16:28 ` Eric Blake
2018-11-16 15:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-11-16 15:54 ` Eric Blake
2018-11-16 16:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/13] blkdebug: Audit for read/write 64-bit cleanness Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/13] blklogwrites: " Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/13] crypto: " Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/13] RFC: crypto: Rely on block layer for fragmentation Eric Blake
2018-11-15 16:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-11-15 18:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-11-15 2:03 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/13] qcow2: Audit for read/write 64-bit cleanness Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 12/13] block: Document need for audit of " Eric Blake
2018-11-15 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 13/13] block: Enforce non-zero bl.max_transfer Eric Blake
2018-11-15 16:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-11-15 16:34 ` Eric Blake
2018-11-15 9:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-4.0 00/13] block: byte-based blocking read/write no-reply
2018-11-15 13:09 ` Eric Blake
2018-11-15 9:04 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181115020334.1189829-11-eblake@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).