From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gN8Yk-000653-DM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 22:43:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gN8Yh-00068l-Pt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 22:43:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gN8Yg-00067y-EW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 22:43:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:43:02 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20181115034302.GB27915@xz-x1> References: <20181101021226.6353-1-zhangckid@gmail.com> <20181114104720.GB3955@xz-x1> <74cca5d1-d2b4-6b44-32fe-332136b8b171@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] migration/colo.c: Fix compilation issue when disable replication List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zhang Chen Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com" , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , f4bug@amsat.org On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 03:16:25AM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:17 PM Peter Maydell > wrote: > > > On 14 November 2018 at 11:06, Thomas Huth wrote: > > > On 2018-11-14 11:47, Peter Xu wrote: > > >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 10:12:26AM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote: > > >>> This compilation issue will occur when user use --disable-replication > > >>> to config Qemu. > > >>> > > >>> Reported-by: Thomas Huth > > >>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> How's the status of this patch? Are we gonna merge it for 3.1? > > >> > > >> I just posted a similar one without knowing this (until Dave pointed > > >> it out). IMHO it can be a good candidate for 3.1. > > > > > > Maybe Peter Maydell could apply this directly to the repo as a built fix? > > > > I'd rather it just went through the migration tree, really... > > it isn't actually breaking any of our travis jobs or other CI. > > > > > Hi Dave, > > What do you think about peter's comments? AFAIK Juan has queued the v2 of the patch into the next migration pull, so it'll reach 3.1 soon if nothing goes wrong. Thanks, -- Peter Xu