From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44029) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNirj-00079z-Os for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:29:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNirg-0007V6-Ll for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:29:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNirg-0007UY-G2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:29:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:29:03 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20181116182903.GF2447@work-vm> References: <20181101021226.6353-1-zhangckid@gmail.com> <20181114104720.GB3955@xz-x1> <74cca5d1-d2b4-6b44-32fe-332136b8b171@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] migration/colo.c: Fix compilation issue when disable replication List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zhang Chen , quintela@redhat.com Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , peterx@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com" , f4bug@amsat.org * Zhang Chen (zhangckid@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:17 PM Peter Maydell > wrote: > > > On 14 November 2018 at 11:06, Thomas Huth wrote: > > > On 2018-11-14 11:47, Peter Xu wrote: > > >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 10:12:26AM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote: > > >>> This compilation issue will occur when user use --disable-replication > > >>> to config Qemu. > > >>> > > >>> Reported-by: Thomas Huth > > >>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> How's the status of this patch? Are we gonna merge it for 3.1? > > >> > > >> I just posted a similar one without knowing this (until Dave pointed > > >> it out). IMHO it can be a good candidate for 3.1. > > > > > > Maybe Peter Maydell could apply this directly to the repo as a built fix? > > > > I'd rather it just went through the migration tree, really... > > it isn't actually breaking any of our travis jobs or other CI. > > > > > Hi Dave, > > What do you think about peter's comments? Yep, that's fine, as Peter Xu says, Juan's picking it up for the next one so we should be OK. Dave > Thanks > Zhang Chen > > > > thanks > > -- PMM > > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK