From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Amit Shah" <amit@kernel.org>,
"Andrea Bolognani" <abologna@redhat.com>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Fam Zheng" <famz@redhat.com>, "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Laine Stump" <laine@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Caio Carrara" <ccarrara@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 v2] virtio: Provide version-specific variants of virtio PCI devices
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:52:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120115227.41ad1f88.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181120004454.GA4755@habkost.net>
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 22:44:54 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:50:56AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:05:59 +0000
> > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > If libvirt did this compatibility approach, can you
> > > confirm this would be live migration state compatible.
> > >
> > > ie can live migrate virtio-*-pci -> virtio-*-pci-transitional,
> > > provided only PCI bus was used.
> >
> > It also needs to make sure that neither disable-legacy nor
> > disable-modern is set. Then this would have a compatible state AFAICS.
> >
> > >
> > > > - virtio-*-pci-non-transitional: modern-only
> > > > - Supports both Conventional PCI and PCI Express buses
> > >
> > > IIUC, libvirt can again provide compatibility with old
> > > QEMU by simply using the existing device type and setting
> > > disable-legacy ? Can you confirm this would be live
> > > migration compatible
> > >
> > > virtio-*-pci + disable-legacy -> virtio-*pci-non-transitional
> >
> > I think yes.
>
> This is exactly how it is implemented internally, but I'm not
> promising that this will be kept compatible forever. And I
> wouldn't like to make that promise unless there's an important
> use case for that.
Shouldn't we be able to ensure compatibility by normal virtio feature
bit handling, as we have already done in the past?
>
> We could easily ensure it will be compatible in pc-4.0 and older,
> though. Would that be enough for the use case we have in mind?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-20 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-14 23:38 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 v2] virtio: Provide version-specific variants of virtio PCI devices Eduardo Habkost
2018-11-15 8:40 ` no-reply
2018-11-15 10:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-11-15 10:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-15 10:52 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-11-20 0:44 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-11-20 10:46 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-11-20 10:52 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-11-20 11:51 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-11-15 11:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-15 15:01 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-27 0:35 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-11-15 16:29 ` Andrea Bolognani
2018-11-16 3:45 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-11-19 10:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-19 18:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-19 18:32 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-19 18:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-19 18:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-19 19:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-20 12:27 ` Andrea Bolognani
2018-11-20 19:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-21 16:20 ` Andrea Bolognani
2018-11-19 21:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-11-20 10:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-11-19 21:47 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-11-20 3:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-20 3:22 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181120115227.41ad1f88.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=abologna@redhat.com \
--cc=amit@kernel.org \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ccarrara@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=laine@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).