From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ben Warren <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:29:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181126162942.21258-9-sameo@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181126162942.21258-1-sameo@linux.intel.com>
We switched to the build_append_*() API for all RSDP callers, and this
patch converts all existing tests depending on this structure.
It is no longer needed and we can thus remove it.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
---
include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 13 ----------
tests/acpi-utils.h | 5 +++-
tests/acpi-utils.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
tests/bios-tables-test.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------
tests/vmgenid-test.c | 8 ++++---
5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
index 9b2f6b8043..abef1d57ae 100644
--- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
+++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
@@ -40,19 +40,6 @@ enum {
ACPI_FADT_F_LOW_POWER_S0_IDLE_CAPABLE,
};
-struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor { /* Root System Descriptor Pointer */
- uint64_t signature; /* ACPI signature, contains "RSD PTR " */
- uint8_t checksum; /* To make sum of struct == 0 */
- uint8_t oem_id [6]; /* OEM identification */
- uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
- uint32_t rsdt_physical_address; /* 32-bit physical address of RSDT */
- uint32_t length; /* XSDT Length in bytes including hdr */
- uint64_t xsdt_physical_address; /* 64-bit physical address of XSDT */
- uint8_t extended_checksum; /* Checksum of entire table */
- uint8_t reserved [3]; /* Reserved field must be 0 */
-} QEMU_PACKED;
-typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor;
-
typedef struct AcpiRsdpData {
uint8_t oem_id[6]; /* OEM identification */
uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h
index ac52abd0dd..fb1a67a21f 100644
--- a/tests/acpi-utils.h
+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ typedef struct {
uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void);
-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table);
+uint32_t acpi_find_rsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
+uint64_t acpi_find_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table,
+ uint8_t revision);
#endif /* TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H */
diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c
index 41dc1ea9b4..c8fe2d1342 100644
--- a/tests/acpi-utils.c
+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c
@@ -52,14 +52,44 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void)
return off;
}
-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table)
+uint32_t acpi_find_rsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
{
- ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->signature, addr);
- ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64(rsdp_table->signature, "RSD PTR ");
-
- ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->checksum, addr);
- ACPI_READ_ARRAY(rsdp_table->oem_id, addr);
- ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->revision, addr);
- ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->rsdt_physical_address, addr);
- ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->length, addr);
+ uint32_t rsdt_physical_address = *((uint32_t *)(rsdp_table +
+ ACPI_RSDP_RSDT_OFFSET));
+ uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[ACPI_RSDP_REVISION_OFFSET];
+
+ if (revision != ACPI_RSDP_REV_1) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return le32_to_cpu(rsdt_physical_address);
+}
+
+uint64_t acpi_find_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
+{
+ uint64_t xsdt_physical_address = *((uint64_t *)(rsdp_table +
+ ACPI_RSDP_XSDT_OFFSET));
+ uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[ACPI_RSDP_REVISION_OFFSET];
+
+ if (revision != ACPI_RSDP_REV_2) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address);
+}
+
+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table, uint8_t revision)
+{
+ switch (revision) {
+ case ACPI_RSDP_REV_1:
+ memread(addr, rsdp_table, ACPI_RSDP_REV_1_LEN);
+ break;
+ case ACPI_RSDP_REV_2:
+ memread(addr, rsdp_table, ACPI_RSDP_REV_2_LEN);
+ break;
+ default:
+ g_assert_not_reached();
+ }
+
+ ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64(*((uint64_t *)(rsdp_table)), ACPI_RSDP_SIGNATURE);
}
diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
index d661d9be62..8cde404bda 100644
--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ typedef struct {
const char *machine;
const char *variant;
uint32_t rsdp_addr;
- AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
+ uint8_t rsdp_table[ACPI_RSDP_REV_2_LEN];
+ uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;
AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;
uint32_t dsdt_addr;
uint32_t facs_addr;
@@ -83,21 +84,31 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)
data->rsdp_addr = off;
}
-static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
+static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data, uint8_t revision)
{
- AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table = &data->rsdp_table;
+ uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table;
uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;
- acpi_parse_rsdp_table(addr, rsdp_table);
+ acpi_parse_rsdp_table(addr, rsdp_table, revision);
- /* rsdp checksum is not for the whole table, but for the first 20 bytes */
- g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum((uint8_t *)rsdp_table, 20));
+ switch (revision) {
+ case ACPI_RSDP_REV_1:
+ /* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */
+ g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, ACPI_RSDP_REV_1_LEN));
+ break;
+ case ACPI_RSDP_REV_2:
+ /* With revision 2, we have 2 checksums */
+ g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, ACPI_RSDP_REV_1_LEN));
+ g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, ACPI_RSDP_REV_2_LEN));
+ default:
+ g_assert_not_reached();
+ }
}
static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data)
{
AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 *rsdt_table = &data->rsdt_table;
- uint32_t addr = le32_to_cpu(data->rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);
+ uint32_t addr = acpi_find_rsdt_address(data->rsdp_table);
uint32_t *tables;
int tables_nr;
uint8_t checksum;
@@ -626,7 +637,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data)
data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
- test_acpi_rsdp_table(data);
+ test_acpi_rsdp_table(data, ACPI_RSDP_REV_1);
test_acpi_rsdt_table(data);
fadt_fetch_facs_and_dsdt_ptrs(data);
test_acpi_facs_table(data);
diff --git a/tests/vmgenid-test.c b/tests/vmgenid-test.c
index 0a6fb55f2e..db5b084c18 100644
--- a/tests/vmgenid-test.c
+++ b/tests/vmgenid-test.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
{
uint32_t rsdp_offset;
uint32_t guid_offset = 0;
- AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
+ uint8_t rsdp_table[ACPI_RSDP_REV_2_LEN];
uint32_t rsdt, rsdt_table_length;
AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;
size_t tables_nr;
@@ -52,9 +52,11 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
g_assert_cmphex(rsdp_offset, <, RSDP_ADDR_INVALID);
- acpi_parse_rsdp_table(rsdp_offset, &rsdp_table);
+ acpi_parse_rsdp_table(rsdp_offset, rsdp_table, ACPI_RSDP_REV_1);
+
+ rsdt = acpi_find_rsdt_address(rsdp_table);
+ g_assert(rsdt);
- rsdt = le32_to_cpu(rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);
/* read the header */
ACPI_READ_TABLE_HEADER(&rsdt_table, rsdt);
ACPI_ASSERT_CMP(rsdt_table.signature, "RSDT");
--
2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-26 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 16:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] hw: acpi: RSDP fixes and refactoring Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] hw: acpi: The RSDP build API can return void Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 17:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-27 14:15 ` Thomas Huth
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] hw: arm: acpi: Fix incorrect checksums in RSDP Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-27 14:50 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] hw: i386: Use correct RSDT length for checksum Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] hw: arm: Carry RSDP specific data through AcpiRsdpData Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 17:42 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-27 15:25 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-27 15:42 ` Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-27 16:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-28 3:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-28 10:05 ` Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-28 9:46 ` Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-28 10:16 ` Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-28 12:12 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] hw: arm: Convert the RSDP build to the buid_append_foo() API Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-27 15:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-27 16:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] hw: acpi: Export and share the ARM " Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 17:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-26 16:29 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2018-11-28 9:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181126162942.21258-9-sameo@linux.intel.com \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).