From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38493) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRRzo-0006B4-WC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:17:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRRzk-0007kQ-3x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:17:00 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:56337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRRzj-0007kD-Rp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:16:56 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:16:51 -0500 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20181127011651.GC22108@flamenco> References: <20181025172057.20414-1-cota@braap.org> <20181025172057.20414-13-cota@braap.org> <871s7dhw8t.fsf@linaro.org> <20181124000938.GD17229@flamenco> <87r2f83x06.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87r2f83x06.fsf@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 12/48] atomic_template: define pre/post macros List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Pavel Dovgalyuk , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs?= Vilanova , Peter Maydell , Stefan Hajnoczi On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:21:13 +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Emilio G. Cota writes: > > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 17:12:34 +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: > >> > >> Emilio G. Cota writes: > >> > >> > In preparation for plugin support. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota > >> > >> More macros for the macro-god. I guess this works but I wonder if it's > >> possible to do a clean-up ala softfloat and the experimental softmmu > >> re-factor that makes this less a mess of macros? > > > > Heh, point taken. > > > > I'll try to fix this once (and if!) the series graduates from RFC > > to proper patchset. BTW I'm planning to pick rth's softfloat > > cleanup soon, so that should help. > > Yeah I was in the middle of re-spinning the softmmu demacro patches but > ran into a bug I didn't get time to track down. I'll get it re-spun once > I've finished going through this. Nice! > I assume the rth's softfloat cleanup is for hardfloat support? I stand > ready to review the next version. We should get it in well before the > 4.0 soft freeze (next release). Yes I meant hardfloat, not softfloat :P I submitted v6 over the weekend. You'll be happy to hear that after applying rth's cleanups, the series only has four macros left, the largest of which only takes 8 lines :-) Emilio