From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRSKe-0007OW-BM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:38:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRSKa-0002Cr-BP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:38:32 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:39055) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRSKa-0002Cl-7r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:38:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:38:25 -0500 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20181127013825.GE22108@flamenco> References: <20181025172057.20414-1-cota@braap.org> <20181025172057.20414-24-cota@braap.org> <87lg5f51sz.fsf@linaro.org> <20181126190733.GC6688@flamenco> <7ff01881-3130-ef72-217d-511b4de0cd3c@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7ff01881-3130-ef72-217d-511b4de0cd3c@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 23/48] translator: add plugin_insn argument to translate_insn List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Stefan Hajnoczi , Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Pavel Dovgalyuk , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs?= Vilanova On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:30:25 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 11/26/18 11:07 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > > The main reason why I added the qemu_plugin_insn_append calls > > was to avoid reading the instructions twice from guest memory, > > because I was worried that doing so might somehow alter the > > guest's execution, e.g. what if we read a cross-page instruction, > > and both pages mapped to the same TLB entry? We'd end up having > > more TLB misses because instrumentation was enabled. > > A better solution for this, I think is to change direct calls from > > cpu_ldl_code(env, pc); > to > translator_ldl_code(dc_base, env, pc); > > instead of passing around a new argument separate from DisasContextBase? I think this + diff'ing pc_next should work to figure out the contents and size of each instruction. I'll do it this way in v2. Thanks, Emilio