From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ben Warren <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] hw: arm: Carry RSDP specific data through AcpiRsdpData
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:42:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181127154218.GA5677@caravaggio> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181127162551.29608eeb@redhat.com>
Hi Igor,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:29:37 +0100
> Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > That will allow us to generalize the ARM build_rsdp() routine to support
> > both legacy RSDP (The current i386 implementation) and extended RSDP
> > (The ARM implementation).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> > index af8e023968..e7fd24c6c5 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> > @@ -53,6 +53,17 @@ struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor { /* Root System Descriptor Pointer */
> > } QEMU_PACKED;
> > typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor;
> >
> > +typedef struct AcpiRsdpData {
> > + uint8_t oem_id[6]; /* OEM identification */
> > + uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
> > +
> > + unsigned *rsdt_tbl_offset;
> > + unsigned *xsdt_tbl_offset;
> > +} AcpiRsdpData;
> > +
>
> > +#define ACPI_RSDP_REV_1 0
> > +#define ACPI_RSDP_REV_2 2
> it's one time used spec defined values so just use values directly
> in place with a comment, so reader won't have to jump around code
> when comparing to spec.
It's also used in the ACPI tests fix patch.
Also the 0 for revision 1 is a little confusing, I feel the above
definition is clearer.
> > +
> > /* Table structure from Linux kernel (the ACPI tables are under the
> > BSD license) */
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > index 0835900052..2dad465ecf 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)
> >
> > /* RSDP */
> > static void
> > -build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset)
> > +build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data)
> > {
> > AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp = acpi_data_push(rsdp_table, sizeof *rsdp);
> > unsigned xsdt_pa_size = sizeof(rsdp->xsdt_physical_address);
> > @@ -379,14 +379,14 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset)
> > true /* fseg memory */);
> >
> > memcpy(&rsdp->signature, "RSD PTR ", sizeof(rsdp->signature));
> > - memcpy(rsdp->oem_id, ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6, sizeof(rsdp->oem_id));
> > + memcpy(rsdp->oem_id, rsdp_data->oem_id, sizeof(rsdp->oem_id));
> > rsdp->length = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(*rsdp));
> > - rsdp->revision = 0x02;
> > + rsdp->revision = rsdp_data->revision;
> >
> > /* Address to be filled by Guest linker */
> > bios_linker_loader_add_pointer(linker,
> > ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE, xsdt_pa_offset, xsdt_pa_size,
> > - ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE, xsdt_tbl_offset);
> > + ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE, *rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset);
> >
> > /* Checksum to be filled by Guest linker */
> > bios_linker_loader_add_checksum(linker, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE,
> > @@ -399,6 +399,20 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset)
> > (char *)&rsdp->extended_checksum - rsdp_table->data);
> > }
> >
> > +static void
> > +init_rsdp_data(AcpiRsdpData *data, const char *oem_id, uint8_t revision,
> > + unsigned *rsdt_offset, unsigned *xsdt_offset)
> > +{
> > + /* Caller must provide an OEM ID */
> > + g_assert(oem_id);
> > + g_assert(strlen(oem_id) >= 6);
> > +
> > + memcpy(data->oem_id, oem_id, 6);
> > + data->revision = revision;
> > + data->rsdt_tbl_offset = rsdt_offset;
> > + data->xsdt_tbl_offset = xsdt_offset;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void
> > build_iort(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, VirtMachineState *vms)
> > {
> > @@ -810,6 +824,7 @@ void virt_acpi_build(VirtMachineState *vms, AcpiBuildTables *tables)
> > GArray *table_offsets;
> > unsigned dsdt, xsdt;
> > GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data;
> > + AcpiRsdpData rsdp;
> s/rsdp/rsdp_info/
>
> >
> > table_offsets = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */,
> > sizeof(uint32_t));
> > @@ -857,7 +872,9 @@ void virt_acpi_build(VirtMachineState *vms, AcpiBuildTables *tables)
> > build_xsdt(tables_blob, tables->linker, table_offsets, NULL, NULL);
> >
> > /* RSDP is in FSEG memory, so allocate it separately */
> > - build_rsdp(tables->rsdp, tables->linker, xsdt);
> > + init_rsdp_data(&rsdp, ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6, ACPI_RSDP_REV_2,
> > + NULL, &xsdt);
> It would be more concise to use declarative style without extra clutter:
>
> - init_rsdp_data(&rsdp, ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6, ACPI_RSDP_REV_2,
> - NULL, &xsdt);
> - build_rsdp(tables->rsdp, tables->linker, &rsdp);
> + {
> + AcpiRsdpData rsdp = {
> + .revision = 2,
> + .oem_id = ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6,
> + .xsdt_tbl_offset = &xsdt,
> + .rsdt_tbl_offset = NULL,
> + };
> + build_rsdp(tables->rsdp, tables->linker, &rsdp);
> + }
2 things here, imo:
- This is not more concise.
- It's code duplication as almost the same snippet is going to be used
for i386/acpi-build.c
Cheers,
Samuel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-27 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 16:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] hw: acpi: RSDP fixes and refactoring Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] hw: acpi: The RSDP build API can return void Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 17:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-27 14:15 ` Thomas Huth
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] hw: arm: acpi: Fix incorrect checksums in RSDP Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-27 14:50 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] hw: i386: Use correct RSDT length for checksum Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] hw: arm: Carry RSDP specific data through AcpiRsdpData Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 17:42 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-27 15:25 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-27 15:42 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2018-11-27 16:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-28 3:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-28 10:05 ` Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-28 9:46 ` Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-28 10:16 ` Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-28 12:12 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] hw: arm: Convert the RSDP build to the buid_append_foo() API Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-27 15:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-27 16:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] hw: acpi: Export and share the ARM " Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-26 17:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-11-26 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-28 9:50 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181127154218.GA5677@caravaggio \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).