qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1?] 9p: remove support for the "handle" backend
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:10:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181130181020.11a4bcec@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_Z9WqjyikYO9CrvP_sM11NU6F7J0xgEimLzNTN7SKaSQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:00:29 +0000
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 16:45, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:52:18 -0600
> > Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > On 11/30/18 2:49 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:  
> > > > The "handle" fsdev backend was deprecated in QEMU 2.12.0 with:
> > > >
> > > > commit db3b3c7281ca82e2647e072a1f97db111313dd73
> > > > Author: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > > > Date:   Mon Jan 8 11:18:23 2018 +0100
> > > >
> > > >      9pfs: deprecate handle backend  
> > >  
> > > > It has passed the two release cooling period without any complaint.
> > > >
> > > > Remove it now.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > It could have been removed for 3.1.0, but I woke up too late, so moving
> > > > this to 4.0.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >   fsdev/qemu-fsdev.c    |    3
> > > >   hw/9pfs/9p-handle.c   |  710 -------------------------------------------------
> > > >   hw/9pfs/Makefile.objs |    1
> > > >   qemu-deprecated.texi  |    8 -
> > > >   qemu-options.hx       |    8 -
> > > >   5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 726 deletions(-)
> > > >   delete mode 100644 hw/9pfs/9p-handle.c  
> > >
> > > Well, it certainly doesn't drive -rc4 on its own, but as we may have an
> > > -rc4 for other reasons, maybe it could still be argued that this is 3.1
> > > material on the grounds of removing questionable code for less attack
> > > exposure?
> > >  
> >
> > Makes sense, as this is precisely the reason that led me to
> > deprecate this in the first place.  
> 
> I would prefer not to have a 700-line patch in rc4, even
> a negative-diffstat one. If it's not a definite problem
> then we shouldn't put the change in at this stage in the
> release process.
> 

I understand, and it's ok for me if this gets merged in 4.0.

Cheers,

--
Greg

> thanks
> -- PMM

      reply	other threads:[~2018-11-30 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-30  8:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0] 9p: remove support for the "handle" backend Greg Kurz
2018-11-30  9:05 ` Thomas Huth
2018-11-30 15:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1?] " Eric Blake
2018-11-30 16:45   ` Greg Kurz
2018-11-30 17:00     ` Peter Maydell
2018-11-30 17:10       ` Greg Kurz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181130181020.11a4bcec@bahia.lan \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).