From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Ben Warren <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 17:43:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181204174305.34a8644d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204151052.otrsahh4dqehiwif@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:10:52 +0100
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > The only remaining AcpiRsdpDescriptor users are the ACPI utils for the
> > BIOS table tests.
> > We remove that dependency and can thus remove the structure itself.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 13 -----------
> > tests/acpi-utils.h | 4 +++-
> > tests/acpi-utils.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 21 +++++++++++++----
> > tests/vmgenid-test.c | 8 ++++---
> > 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> > index 8425ecb8c6..5021cb9e79 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> > @@ -40,19 +40,6 @@ enum {
> > ACPI_FADT_F_LOW_POWER_S0_IDLE_CAPABLE,
> > };
> >
> > -struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor { /* Root System Descriptor Pointer */
> > - uint64_t signature; /* ACPI signature, contains "RSD PTR " */
> > - uint8_t checksum; /* To make sum of struct == 0 */
> > - uint8_t oem_id [6]; /* OEM identification */
> > - uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
> > - uint32_t rsdt_physical_address; /* 32-bit physical address of RSDT */
> > - uint32_t length; /* XSDT Length in bytes including hdr */
> > - uint64_t xsdt_physical_address; /* 64-bit physical address of XSDT */
> > - uint8_t extended_checksum; /* Checksum of entire table */
> > - uint8_t reserved [3]; /* Reserved field must be 0 */
> > -} QEMU_PACKED;
> > -typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor;
> > -
> > typedef struct AcpiRsdpData {
> > uint8_t oem_id[6]; /* OEM identification */
> > uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
> > diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> > index ac52abd0dd..4f4899deb5 100644
> > --- a/tests/acpi-utils.h
> > +++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> > @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ typedef struct {
> >
> > uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
> > uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void);
> > -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table);
> > +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> > +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> > +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> >
> > #endif /* TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H */
> > diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> > index 41dc1ea9b4..d07f7487e2 100644
> > --- a/tests/acpi-utils.c
> > +++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> > @@ -52,14 +52,44 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void)
> > return off;
> > }
> >
> > -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table)
> > +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> > {
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->signature, addr);
> > - ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64(rsdp_table->signature, "RSD PTR ");
> > + uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;
> >
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->checksum, addr);
> > - ACPI_READ_ARRAY(rsdp_table->oem_id, addr);
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->revision, addr);
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->rsdt_physical_address, addr);
> > - ACPI_READ_FIELD(rsdp_table->length, addr);
> > + memcpy(&rsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress offset */], 4);
> > + return le32_to_cpu(rsdt_physical_address);
> > +}
> > +
> > +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> > +{
> > + uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;
> > + uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> > +
> > + /* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */
> > + g_assert(revision == 2);
> > +
> > + memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */], 8);
> > + return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> > +{
> > + uint8_t revision;
> > +
> > + /* Read mandatory revision 0 table data (20 bytes) first */
> > + memread(addr, rsdp_table, 20);
> > + revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> > +
> > + switch (revision) {
> > + case 0: /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> > + break;
> > + case 2: /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */
> > + /* Read the rest of the RSDP table */
> > + memread(addr + 20, rsdp_table + 20, 16);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > + }
> > +
> > + ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64(*((uint64_t *)(rsdp_table)), "RSD PTR ");
> > }
> > diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > index d661d9be62..8749b77b36 100644
> > --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ typedef struct {
> > const char *machine;
> > const char *variant;
> > uint32_t rsdp_addr;
> > - AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
> > + uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
> > AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;
> > uint32_t dsdt_addr;
> > uint32_t facs_addr;
> > @@ -85,19 +85,30 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)
> >
> > static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
> > {
> > - AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table = &data->rsdp_table;
> > + uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table, revision;
> > uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;
> >
> > acpi_parse_rsdp_table(addr, rsdp_table);
> > + revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> >
> > - /* rsdp checksum is not for the whole table, but for the first 20 bytes */
> > - g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum((uint8_t *)rsdp_table, 20));
> > + switch (revision) {
> > + case 0: /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> > + /* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */
> > + g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, 20));
> > + break;
> > + case 2: /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */
> > + /* With revision 2, we have 2 checksums */
> > + g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, 20));
> > + g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table, 36));
>
> Missing break. I guess this wasn't yet tested with ACPI 2.0+?
> Are we going to extend the tests to do that?
I'm working on adding arm/virt board to these tests,
so that will use this 2.0 path
>
> > + default:
> > + g_assert_not_reached();
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data)
> > {
> > AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 *rsdt_table = &data->rsdt_table;
> > - uint32_t addr = le32_to_cpu(data->rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);
> > + uint32_t addr = acpi_get_rsdt_address(data->rsdp_table);
> > uint32_t *tables;
> > int tables_nr;
> > uint8_t checksum;
> > diff --git a/tests/vmgenid-test.c b/tests/vmgenid-test.c
> > index 0a6fb55f2e..97219ae86c 100644
> > --- a/tests/vmgenid-test.c
> > +++ b/tests/vmgenid-test.c
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
> > {
> > uint32_t rsdp_offset;
> > uint32_t guid_offset = 0;
> > - AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
> > + uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
> > uint32_t rsdt, rsdt_table_length;
> > AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;
> > size_t tables_nr;
> > @@ -52,9 +52,11 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
> >
> > g_assert_cmphex(rsdp_offset, <, RSDP_ADDR_INVALID);
> >
> > - acpi_parse_rsdp_table(rsdp_offset, &rsdp_table);
> > + acpi_parse_rsdp_table(rsdp_offset, rsdp_table);
> > +
> > + rsdt = acpi_get_rsdt_address(rsdp_table);
> > + g_assert(rsdt);
> >
> > - rsdt = le32_to_cpu(rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);
> > /* read the header */
> > ACPI_READ_TABLE_HEADER(&rsdt_table, rsdt);
> > ACPI_ASSERT_CMP(rsdt_table.signature, "RSDT");
> > --
> > 2.19.2
> >
> >
>
> Besides the missing break
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-04 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-30 13:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/8] hw: acpi: RSDP fixes and refactoring Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-30 13:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/8] hw: acpi: The RSDP build API can return void Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-30 13:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/8] hw: arm: acpi: Fix incorrect checksums in RSDP Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-30 13:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/8] hw: i386: Use correct RSDT length for checksum Samuel Ortiz
2018-11-30 13:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/8] hw: arm: Carry RSDP specific data through AcpiRsdpData Samuel Ortiz
2018-12-04 14:49 ` Andrew Jones
2018-11-30 13:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/8] hw: arm: Convert the RSDP build to the buid_append_foo() API Samuel Ortiz
2018-12-04 13:41 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-30 13:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/8] hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build Samuel Ortiz
2018-12-04 13:47 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-12-04 14:53 ` Andrew Jones
2018-11-30 13:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 7/8] hw: acpi: Export and share the ARM " Samuel Ortiz
2018-12-04 14:01 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-11-30 13:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests Samuel Ortiz
2018-12-04 14:06 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-12-04 15:10 ` Andrew Jones
2018-12-04 16:43 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181204174305.34a8644d@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).