From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] vfio-ap: flag as compatible with balloon
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:38:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181207133841.102a923e.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e03f504-807d-12d4-368d-ed3b069b351e@de.ibm.com>
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:32:14 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 07.12.2018 13:29, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:17:02 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 05.12.2018 15:51, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> vfio-ap devices do not pin any pages in the host. Therefore, they
> >>> are belived to be compatible with memory ballooning.
> >>>
> >>> Flag them as compatible, so both vfio-ap and a balloon can be
> >>> used simultaneously.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> Does it make sense to add cc stable for 3.1?
> >
> > Can do that, given that s390x systems really rely on the ballooner in
> > general.
>
> Well, not relying is the wrong word. It is just strange that things like
>
> <memory unit='GiB'>2</memory>
> <currentMemory unit='GiB'>1</currentMemory>
>
> do work
> but suddenly no longer work when an AP device is added.
>
Let me rephrase that: Current setups rely on the functionality, and we
don't want to break them by adding ap :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-07 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-05 14:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] vfio-ap: flag as compatible with balloon Cornelia Huck
2018-12-05 16:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-12-05 16:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-05 16:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-05 17:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-12-06 8:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-06 12:32 ` Halil Pasic
2018-12-06 12:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-06 20:51 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-12-06 23:01 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-12-07 12:17 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-12-07 12:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-07 12:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-12-07 12:38 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-12-07 12:52 ` Halil Pasic
2018-12-07 13:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-07 14:04 ` Halil Pasic
2018-12-07 15:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-07 15:05 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181207133841.102a923e.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).