From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c: Don't take address of fields in packed structs
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:06:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210140642.4f2f457c@oc2783563651> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210120436.30522-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:04:36 +0000
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because
> it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and
> thus cause a crash on dereference on some host architectures). Newer
> versions of clang warn about this. Avoid the bug by not using the
> "modify in place" byte swapping functions.
>
> Patch produced with scripts/coccinelle/inplace-byteswaps.cocci
> (with a couple of long lines manually wrapped).
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
I wonder if packed was a good idea in the first place. @Connie: Do you
have an opinion on this?
Regards,
Halil
> ---
> s390 also has some warnings in hw/s390x/css.c which are going to
> be harder to fix, relating to taking the address of the 'pmcw' and
> 'scsw' fields in the SCHUB struct...
>
> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
> index 212b3d3dead..c2b78c8e9b1 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -287,18 +287,18 @@ static int virtio_ccw_handle_set_vq(SubchDev *sch, CCW1 ccw, bool check_len,
> }
> if (is_legacy) {
> ccw_dstream_read(&sch->cds, linfo);
> - be64_to_cpus(&linfo.queue);
> - be32_to_cpus(&linfo.align);
> - be16_to_cpus(&linfo.index);
> - be16_to_cpus(&linfo.num);
> + linfo.queue = be64_to_cpu(linfo.queue);
> + linfo.align = be32_to_cpu(linfo.align);
> + linfo.index = be16_to_cpu(linfo.index);
> + linfo.num = be16_to_cpu(linfo.num);
> ret = virtio_ccw_set_vqs(sch, NULL, &linfo);
> } else {
> ccw_dstream_read(&sch->cds, info);
> - be64_to_cpus(&info.desc);
> - be16_to_cpus(&info.index);
> - be16_to_cpus(&info.num);
> - be64_to_cpus(&info.avail);
> - be64_to_cpus(&info.used);
> + info.desc = be64_to_cpu(info.desc);
> + info.index = be16_to_cpu(info.index);
> + info.num = be16_to_cpu(info.num);
> + info.avail = be64_to_cpu(info.avail);
> + info.used = be64_to_cpu(info.used);
> ret = virtio_ccw_set_vqs(sch, &info, NULL);
> }
> sch->curr_status.scsw.count = 0;
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int virtio_ccw_cb(SubchDev *sch, CCW1 ccw)
> features.features = 0;
> }
> ccw_dstream_rewind(&sch->cds);
> - cpu_to_le32s(&features.features);
> + features.features = cpu_to_le32(features.features);
> ccw_dstream_write(&sch->cds, features.features);
> sch->curr_status.scsw.count = ccw.count - sizeof(features);
> ret = 0;
> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static int virtio_ccw_cb(SubchDev *sch, CCW1 ccw)
> ret = -EFAULT;
> } else {
> ccw_dstream_read(&sch->cds, features);
> - le32_to_cpus(&features.features);
> + features.features = le32_to_cpu(features.features);
> if (features.index == 0) {
> virtio_set_features(vdev,
> (vdev->guest_features & 0xffffffff00000000ULL) |
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static int virtio_ccw_cb(SubchDev *sch, CCW1 ccw)
> ret = -EFAULT;
> } else {
> ccw_dstream_read(&sch->cds, indicators);
> - be64_to_cpus(&indicators);
> + indicators = be64_to_cpu(indicators);
> dev->indicators = get_indicator(indicators, sizeof(uint64_t));
> sch->curr_status.scsw.count = ccw.count - sizeof(indicators);
> ret = 0;
> @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static int virtio_ccw_cb(SubchDev *sch, CCW1 ccw)
> ret = -EFAULT;
> } else {
> ccw_dstream_read(&sch->cds, indicators);
> - be64_to_cpus(&indicators);
> + indicators = be64_to_cpu(indicators);
> dev->indicators2 = get_indicator(indicators, sizeof(uint64_t));
> sch->curr_status.scsw.count = ccw.count - sizeof(indicators);
> ret = 0;
> @@ -588,14 +588,14 @@ static int virtio_ccw_cb(SubchDev *sch, CCW1 ccw)
> ret = -EFAULT;
> } else {
> ccw_dstream_read(&sch->cds, vq_config.index);
> - be16_to_cpus(&vq_config.index);
> + vq_config.index = be16_to_cpu(vq_config.index);
> if (vq_config.index >= VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> break;
> }
> vq_config.num_max = virtio_queue_get_num(vdev,
> vq_config.index);
> - cpu_to_be16s(&vq_config.num_max);
> + vq_config.num_max = cpu_to_be16(vq_config.num_max);
> ccw_dstream_write(&sch->cds, vq_config.num_max);
> sch->curr_status.scsw.count = ccw.count - sizeof(vq_config);
> ret = 0;
> @@ -621,9 +621,11 @@ static int virtio_ccw_cb(SubchDev *sch, CCW1 ccw)
> if (ccw_dstream_read(&sch->cds, thinint)) {
> ret = -EFAULT;
> } else {
> - be64_to_cpus(&thinint.ind_bit);
> - be64_to_cpus(&thinint.summary_indicator);
> - be64_to_cpus(&thinint.device_indicator);
> + thinint.ind_bit = be64_to_cpu(thinint.ind_bit);
> + thinint.summary_indicator =
> + be64_to_cpu(thinint.summary_indicator);
> + thinint.device_indicator =
> + be64_to_cpu(thinint.device_indicator);
>
> dev->summary_indicator =
> get_indicator(thinint.summary_indicator, sizeof(uint8_t));
> @@ -654,8 +656,8 @@ static int virtio_ccw_cb(SubchDev *sch, CCW1 ccw)
> break;
> }
> ccw_dstream_read_buf(&sch->cds, &revinfo, 4);
> - be16_to_cpus(&revinfo.revision);
> - be16_to_cpus(&revinfo.length);
> + revinfo.revision = be16_to_cpu(revinfo.revision);
> + revinfo.length = be16_to_cpu(revinfo.length);
> if (ccw.count < len + revinfo.length ||
> (check_len && ccw.count > len + revinfo.length)) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-10 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-10 12:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c: Don't take address of fields in packed structs Peter Maydell
2018-12-10 12:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-12-10 13:06 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2018-12-10 13:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Cornelia Huck
2018-12-10 15:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181210140642.4f2f457c@oc2783563651 \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).