From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] block: Is name of BlockBackend deprecated with -blockdev parameter?
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:47:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181211094709.GA31849@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h8fkbjyn.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
Am 11.12.2018 um 08:28 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> I figure Kevin knows, but you typoed his e-mail address. I fixed it for
> you.
>
> Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to switch from -drive parameter to -blockdev + -device and
> > having problems. Looks like with this option I have no way to set the
> > name of created BlockBackend, but some QMP and HMP commands are
> > trying to find blk with blk_by_name() and fail to locate my device
> > (e.g. hmp_commit, qmp_x_bloc_latency_histogram_set ...). Was it
> > intentional and BB names are going to be deprecated?
> >
> > This also seems to be a the case for all block devices hotplugged with
> > QMP as they use the same code path.
> >
> > As far as I understand all named backends are stored in
> > monitor_block_backends list, but I can't get what is the point of
> > having this list, and why parse_drive() function doesn't call
> > monitor_add_blk() like blockdev_init() does with -drive option. Can
> > someone give me a hint on this?
> >
> > I also noticed that some commands fallback to search by qdev_id or
> > BDS->node_name, but at the creation time (both in
> > bdrv_assing_node_name and monitor_add_blk) it is already checked that
> > names are unique across these namespaces so may be it would be useful
> > to introduce generic search function?
Yes, BlockBackend names are not supposed to be used in the external
interfaces any more. If the QMP command is about the backend, it will
take a node name, and if it's about the guest device (which may not even
have a node attached with removable media), it will take a qdev ID.
The implementation of qmp_x_block_latency_histogram_set() is incorrect,
it shouldn't use blk_by_name(). I wonder where it got that pattern from
because it was added long after all other QMP commands had switched to
qmp_get_blk() or bdrv_lookup_bs().
hmp_commit() should indeed use bdrv_lookup_bs() to also accept node
names. I think we reviewed QMP to make sure we converted everything
and forgot about HMP commands that aren't mapped to QMP.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-11 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-10 19:10 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] block: Is name of BlockBackend deprecated with -blockdev parameter? Anton Kuchin
2018-12-11 7:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-12-11 9:47 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2018-12-14 12:18 ` Anton Kuchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181211094709.GA31849@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).