From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gXSPm-0005fl-Ua for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:56:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gXSPm-0001Dk-47 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:56:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:56:27 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20181213155627.778fd434.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20181213120252.21697-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> References: <20181213120252.21697-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] hw/s390/ccw.c: Don't take address of packed members List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, David Hildenbrand , Richard Henderson , Christian Borntraeger , Thomas Huth , Farhan Ali On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:02:52 +0000 Peter Maydell wrote: > Taking the address of a field in a packed struct is a bad idea, because > it might not be actually aligned enough for that pointer type (and > thus cause a crash on dereference on some host architectures). Newer > versions of clang warn about this. > > Avoid the problem by using local copies of the PMCW and SCSW > struct fields in copy_schib_from_guest() and copy_schib_to_guest(). > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell > --- > v1->v2 changes: > * add comment about why we're using locals > * name locals with underscores, as QEMU's naming conventions recommend > > > hw/s390x/css.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Thanks, applied.