* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common fmb @ 2018-12-14 16:53 Pierre Morel 2018-12-14 16:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common function measurement block Pierre Morel 2018-12-17 9:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common fmb Cornelia Huck 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Pierre Morel @ 2018-12-14 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: walling Cc: borntraeger, cohuck, rth, david, qemu-s390x, qemu-devel, pasic, thuth After the last review round I worked on endianness. Doing this I found some errors in the code and in the interpretation of the documentation. The new patch changed the following from previous version: In s390-pci-bus: - Initialize the FMB Format. In s390-pci-bus.h - re-organization of the internal counters, having a table for the internal counters. In s390-pci-inst.c - Internal counters update (LD/ST/STB/RPCIT) is done always. even if the FMB if fmb_addr is NULL. AFAIU this respect the documentation which only states that FMB update is stopped. - in mpcifc_service_call(), moved the setting of fmb_addr after the timer has been stopped. - fmb_update((), use address_space_stq_be() to handle endianness when storing the FMB. - define the format with 32 bits instead of one char and reserved chars, this is easier to handle the FMB copy. - No update of the DMA fields inside the FMB, as stipulated by the documentation when format32 is 0. Patch is tested (for the good case) on Z(KVM) and X(TCG). Yi Min Zhao (1): s390x/pci: add common function measurement block hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 +- hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 29 ++++++++++ hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common function measurement block 2018-12-14 16:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common fmb Pierre Morel @ 2018-12-14 16:53 ` Pierre Morel 2018-12-18 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck 2018-12-17 9:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common fmb Cornelia Huck 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Pierre Morel @ 2018-12-14 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: walling Cc: borntraeger, cohuck, rth, david, qemu-s390x, qemu-devel, pasic, thuth From: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.ibm.com> Common function measurement block is used to report zPCI internal counters of successful pcilg/stg/stb and rpcit instructions to a memory location provided by the program. This patch introduces a new ZpciFmb structure and schedules a timer callback to copy the zPCI measures to the FMB in the guest memory at an interval time set to 4s by default. An error while attemping to update the FMB, would generated an error event to the guest. The pcilg/stg/stb and rpcit interception handlers issue, increase the related counter on success. The guest shall pass a null FMBA (FMB address) in the FIB (Function Information Block) when it issues a Modify PCI Function Control instrcuction to switch off FMB and stop the corresponding timer. Signed-off-by: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 +- hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 29 ++++++++++ hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c index 060ff06..f0d34dd 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c @@ -989,6 +989,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_hot_unplug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, bus = pci_get_bus(pci_dev); devfn = pci_dev->devfn; object_unparent(OBJECT(pci_dev)); + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); s390_pci_msix_free(pbdev); s390_pci_iommu_free(s, bus, devfn); pbdev->pdev = NULL; @@ -1136,6 +1137,7 @@ static void s390_pci_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) } zpci->state = ZPCI_FS_RESERVED; + zpci->fmb.format = ZPCI_FMB_FORMAT; } static void s390_pci_device_reset(DeviceState *dev) @@ -1160,7 +1162,7 @@ static void s390_pci_device_reset(DeviceState *dev) pci_dereg_ioat(pbdev->iommu); } - pbdev->fmb_addr = 0; + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); } static void s390_pci_get_fid(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h index 1f7f9b5..69353ef 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h @@ -286,6 +286,33 @@ typedef struct S390PCIIOMMUTable { S390PCIIOMMU *iommu[PCI_SLOT_MAX]; } S390PCIIOMMUTable; +/* Function Measurement Block */ +#define DEFAULT_MUI 4000 +#define UPDATE_U_BIT 0x1ULL +#define FMBK_MASK 0xfULL + +typedef struct ZpciFmbFmt0 { + uint64_t dma_rbytes; + uint64_t dma_wbytes; +} ZpciFmbFmt0; + +#define ZPCI_FMB_CNT_LD 0 +#define ZPCI_FMB_CNT_ST 1 +#define ZPCI_FMB_CNT_STB 2 +#define ZPCI_FMB_CNT_RPCIT 3 +#define ZPCI_FMB_CNT_MAX 4 + +#define ZPCI_FMB_FORMAT 0 + +typedef struct ZpciFmb { + uint32_t format; + uint32_t sample; + uint64_t last_update; + uint64_t counter[ZPCI_FMB_CNT_MAX]; + ZpciFmbFmt0 fmt0; +} ZpciFmb; +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(offsetof(ZpciFmb, fmt0) != 48, "padding in ZpciFmb"); + struct S390PCIBusDevice { DeviceState qdev; PCIDevice *pdev; @@ -297,6 +324,8 @@ struct S390PCIBusDevice { uint32_t fid; bool fid_defined; uint64_t fmb_addr; + ZpciFmb fmb; + QEMUTimer *fmb_timer; uint8_t isc; uint16_t noi; uint16_t maxstbl; diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c index 7b61367..117a217 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include "exec/memory-internal.h" #include "qemu/error-report.h" #include "sysemu/hw_accel.h" +#include "hw/s390x/tod.h" #ifndef DEBUG_S390PCI_INST #define DEBUG_S390PCI_INST 0 @@ -293,7 +294,7 @@ int clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra) resgrp->fr = 1; stq_p(&resgrp->dasm, 0); stq_p(&resgrp->msia, ZPCI_MSI_ADDR); - stw_p(&resgrp->mui, 0); + stw_p(&resgrp->mui, DEFAULT_MUI); stw_p(&resgrp->i, 128); stw_p(&resgrp->maxstbl, 128); resgrp->version = 0; @@ -456,6 +457,8 @@ int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra) return 0; } + pbdev->fmb.counter[ZPCI_FMB_CNT_LD]++; + env->regs[r1] = data; setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_OK); return 0; @@ -561,6 +564,8 @@ int pcistg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra) return 0; } + pbdev->fmb.counter[ZPCI_FMB_CNT_ST]++; + setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_OK); return 0; } @@ -681,6 +686,7 @@ err: s390_set_status_code(env, r1, ZPCI_PCI_ST_FUNC_IN_ERR); s390_pci_generate_error_event(error, pbdev->fh, pbdev->fid, start, 0); } else { + pbdev->fmb.counter[ZPCI_FMB_CNT_RPCIT]++; setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_OK); } return 0; @@ -783,6 +789,8 @@ int pcistb_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r3, uint64_t gaddr, } } + pbdev->fmb.counter[ZPCI_FMB_CNT_STB]++; + setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_OK); return 0; @@ -889,6 +897,107 @@ void pci_dereg_ioat(S390PCIIOMMU *iommu) iommu->g_iota = 0; } +void fmb_timer_free(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev) +{ + if (pbdev->fmb_timer) { + timer_del(pbdev->fmb_timer); + timer_free(pbdev->fmb_timer); + pbdev->fmb_timer = NULL; + } + pbdev->fmb_addr = 0; + memset(&pbdev->fmb, 0, sizeof(ZpciFmb)); +} + +static int fmb_do_update64(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, int offset, int cnt) +{ + MemTxResult ret = MEMTX_OK; + uint64_t dst = pbdev->fmb_addr + offset; + uint64_t *src = (uint64_t *) ((unsigned long)(&pbdev->fmb) + offset); + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++, dst += 8, src++) { + address_space_stq_be(&address_space_memory, dst, *src, + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, &ret); + if (ret != MEMTX_OK) { + s390_pci_generate_error_event(ERR_EVENT_FMBA, pbdev->fh, pbdev->fid, + pbdev->fmb_addr, 0); + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); + return ret; + } + } + return ret; +} + +static int fmb_do_update(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, int offset, int val, int len) +{ + MemTxResult ret; + uint64_t dst = pbdev->fmb_addr + offset; + + switch (len) { + case 4: + address_space_stl_be(&address_space_memory, dst, val, + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, + &ret); + break; + case 2: + address_space_stw_be(&address_space_memory, dst, val, + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, + &ret); + break; + case 1: + address_space_stb(&address_space_memory, dst, val, + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, + &ret); + break; + default: + ret = MEMTX_ERROR; + break; + } + if (ret != MEMTX_OK) { + s390_pci_generate_error_event(ERR_EVENT_FMBA, pbdev->fh, pbdev->fid, + pbdev->fmb_addr, 0); + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); + } + + return ret; +} + +static void fmb_update(void *opaque) +{ + S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev = opaque; + int64_t t = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL); + uint8_t offset; + + /* Update U bit */ + pbdev->fmb.last_update |= UPDATE_U_BIT; + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, last_update); + if (fmb_do_update64(pbdev, offset, 1)) { + return; + } + + /* Update FMB sample count */ + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, sample); + if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, offset, pbdev->fmb.sample++, + sizeof(pbdev->fmb.sample))) { + return; + } + /* Update FMB counters */ + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, counter); + if (fmb_do_update64(pbdev, offset, ZPCI_FMB_CNT_MAX)) { + return; + } + + /* Clear U bit and update the time */ + pbdev->fmb.last_update = time2tod(qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL)); + pbdev->fmb.last_update <<= 1; + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, last_update); + if (fmb_do_update64(pbdev, offset, 1)) { + return; + } + + timer_mod(pbdev->fmb_timer, t + DEFAULT_MUI); +} + int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar, uintptr_t ra) { @@ -1018,9 +1127,35 @@ int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar, s390_set_status_code(env, r1, ZPCI_MOD_ST_SEQUENCE); } break; - case ZPCI_MOD_FC_SET_MEASURE: - pbdev->fmb_addr = ldq_p(&fib.fmb_addr); + case ZPCI_MOD_FC_SET_MEASURE: { + uint64_t fmb_addr = ldq_p(&fib.fmb_addr); + + if (fmb_addr & FMBK_MASK) { + cc = ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR; + s390_pci_generate_error_event(ERR_EVENT_FMBPRO, pbdev->fh, + pbdev->fid, fmb_addr, 0); + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); + break; + } + + if (!fmb_addr) { + /* Stop updating FMB. */ + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); + break; + } + + if (!pbdev->fmb_timer) { + pbdev->fmb_timer = timer_new_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, + fmb_update, pbdev); + } else if (timer_pending(pbdev->fmb_timer)) { + /* Remove pending timer to update FMB address. */ + timer_del(pbdev->fmb_timer); + } + pbdev->fmb_addr = fmb_addr; + timer_mod(pbdev->fmb_timer, + qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) + DEFAULT_MUI); break; + } default: s390_program_interrupt(&cpu->env, PGM_OPERAND, 6, ra); cc = ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR; diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h index 91c3d61..fa3bf8b 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h @@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar, uintptr_t ra); int stpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar, uintptr_t ra); +void fmb_timer_free(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev); #define ZPCI_IO_BAR_MIN 0 #define ZPCI_IO_BAR_MAX 5 -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common function measurement block 2018-12-14 16:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common function measurement block Pierre Morel @ 2018-12-18 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck 2018-12-18 17:20 ` Pierre Morel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Cornelia Huck @ 2018-12-18 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pierre Morel Cc: walling, borntraeger, rth, david, qemu-s390x, qemu-devel, pasic, thuth On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:53:42 +0100 Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > From: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.ibm.com> > > Common function measurement block is used to report zPCI internal > counters of successful pcilg/stg/stb and rpcit instructions to > a memory location provided by the program. > > This patch introduces a new ZpciFmb structure and schedules a timer > callback to copy the zPCI measures to the FMB in the guest memory > at an interval time set to 4s by default. Hm, is there any way to change the interval? If not, just drop the "by default"? > > An error while attemping to update the FMB, would generated an error s/generated/generate/ > event to the guest. > > The pcilg/stg/stb and rpcit interception handlers issue, increase > the related counter on success. "When the ... handlers are called, ..." ? > The guest shall pass a null FMBA (FMB address) in the FIB (Function > Information Block) when it issues a Modify PCI Function Control > instrcuction to switch off FMB and stop the corresponding timer. > > Signed-off-by: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> > --- > hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 +- > hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 29 ++++++++++ > hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h | 1 + > 4 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > +static int fmb_do_update64(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, int offset, int cnt) > +{ > + MemTxResult ret = MEMTX_OK; > + uint64_t dst = pbdev->fmb_addr + offset; > + uint64_t *src = (uint64_t *) ((unsigned long)(&pbdev->fmb) + offset); > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++, dst += 8, src++) { > + address_space_stq_be(&address_space_memory, dst, *src, > + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, &ret); > + if (ret != MEMTX_OK) { > + s390_pci_generate_error_event(ERR_EVENT_FMBA, pbdev->fh, pbdev->fid, > + pbdev->fmb_addr, 0); > + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); > + return ret; > + } > + } > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int fmb_do_update(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, int offset, int val, int len) > +{ > + MemTxResult ret; > + uint64_t dst = pbdev->fmb_addr + offset; > + > + switch (len) { > + case 4: > + address_space_stl_be(&address_space_memory, dst, val, > + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, > + &ret); > + break; > + case 2: > + address_space_stw_be(&address_space_memory, dst, val, > + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, > + &ret); > + break; > + case 1: > + address_space_stb(&address_space_memory, dst, val, > + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, > + &ret); > + break; > + default: > + ret = MEMTX_ERROR; > + break; > + } > + if (ret != MEMTX_OK) { > + s390_pci_generate_error_event(ERR_EVENT_FMBA, pbdev->fh, pbdev->fid, > + pbdev->fmb_addr, 0); > + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void fmb_update(void *opaque) > +{ > + S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev = opaque; > + int64_t t = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL); > + uint8_t offset; > + > + /* Update U bit */ > + pbdev->fmb.last_update |= UPDATE_U_BIT; > + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, last_update); > + if (fmb_do_update64(pbdev, offset, 1)) { > + return; > + } > + > + /* Update FMB sample count */ > + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, sample); > + if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, offset, pbdev->fmb.sample++, > + sizeof(pbdev->fmb.sample))) { This is the only caller of fmb_do_update(), right? Any chance that a new format of the block would introduce new callers? > + return; > + } > + /* Update FMB counters */ > + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, counter); > + if (fmb_do_update64(pbdev, offset, ZPCI_FMB_CNT_MAX)) { > + return; > + } > + > + /* Clear U bit and update the time */ > + pbdev->fmb.last_update = time2tod(qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL)); > + pbdev->fmb.last_update <<= 1; > + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, last_update); > + if (fmb_do_update64(pbdev, offset, 1)) { > + return; > + } Hm, one thing that I don't quite like about the update code is the odd split between fmb_do_update() (which always updates one value) and fmb_do_update64() (which may update multiple values). What does the code look like if you: - have a fmb_do_update() that can also handle 64bit values, - have the update of the counters loop and break out if you get an error? Of course, you may have already tried that ;) If it looks ugly, I don't have a real issue with this code, either. > + > + timer_mod(pbdev->fmb_timer, t + DEFAULT_MUI); > +} > + > int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar, > uintptr_t ra) > { ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common function measurement block 2018-12-18 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck @ 2018-12-18 17:20 ` Pierre Morel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Pierre Morel @ 2018-12-18 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cornelia Huck Cc: walling, borntraeger, rth, david, qemu-s390x, qemu-devel, pasic, thuth On 18/12/2018 10:55, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:53:42 +0100 > Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > >> From: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.ibm.com> >> >> Common function measurement block is used to report zPCI internal >> counters of successful pcilg/stg/stb and rpcit instructions to >> a memory location provided by the program. >> >> This patch introduces a new ZpciFmb structure and schedules a timer >> callback to copy the zPCI measures to the FMB in the guest memory >> at an interval time set to 4s by default. > > Hm, is there any way to change the interval? If not, just drop the "by > default"? > >> >> An error while attemping to update the FMB, would generated an error > > s/generated/generate/ > >> event to the guest. >> >> The pcilg/stg/stb and rpcit interception handlers issue, increase >> the related counter on success. > > "When the ... handlers are called, ..." ? > >> The guest shall pass a null FMBA (FMB address) in the FIB (Function >> Information Block) when it issues a Modify PCI Function Control >> instrcuction to switch off FMB and stop the corresponding timer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.ibm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> >> --- >> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 +- >> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 29 ++++++++++ >> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h | 1 + >> 4 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> > >> +static int fmb_do_update64(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, int offset, int cnt) >> +{ >> + MemTxResult ret = MEMTX_OK; >> + uint64_t dst = pbdev->fmb_addr + offset; >> + uint64_t *src = (uint64_t *) ((unsigned long)(&pbdev->fmb) + offset); >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++, dst += 8, src++) { >> + address_space_stq_be(&address_space_memory, dst, *src, >> + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, &ret); >> + if (ret != MEMTX_OK) { >> + s390_pci_generate_error_event(ERR_EVENT_FMBA, pbdev->fh, pbdev->fid, >> + pbdev->fmb_addr, 0); >> + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + } >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int fmb_do_update(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, int offset, int val, int len) >> +{ >> + MemTxResult ret; >> + uint64_t dst = pbdev->fmb_addr + offset; >> + >> + switch (len) { >> + case 4: >> + address_space_stl_be(&address_space_memory, dst, val, >> + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, >> + &ret); >> + break; >> + case 2: >> + address_space_stw_be(&address_space_memory, dst, val, >> + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, >> + &ret); >> + break; >> + case 1: >> + address_space_stb(&address_space_memory, dst, val, >> + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, >> + &ret); >> + break; >> + default: >> + ret = MEMTX_ERROR; >> + break; >> + } >> + if (ret != MEMTX_OK) { >> + s390_pci_generate_error_event(ERR_EVENT_FMBA, pbdev->fh, pbdev->fid, >> + pbdev->fmb_addr, 0); >> + fmb_timer_free(pbdev); >> + } >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static void fmb_update(void *opaque) >> +{ >> + S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev = opaque; >> + int64_t t = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL); >> + uint8_t offset; >> + >> + /* Update U bit */ >> + pbdev->fmb.last_update |= UPDATE_U_BIT; >> + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, last_update); >> + if (fmb_do_update64(pbdev, offset, 1)) { >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + /* Update FMB sample count */ >> + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, sample); >> + if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, offset, pbdev->fmb.sample++, >> + sizeof(pbdev->fmb.sample))) { > > This is the only caller of fmb_do_update(), right? Any chance that a > new format of the block would introduce new callers? > >> + return; >> + } >> + /* Update FMB counters */ >> + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, counter); >> + if (fmb_do_update64(pbdev, offset, ZPCI_FMB_CNT_MAX)) { >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + /* Clear U bit and update the time */ >> + pbdev->fmb.last_update = time2tod(qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL)); >> + pbdev->fmb.last_update <<= 1; >> + offset = offsetof(ZpciFmb, last_update); >> + if (fmb_do_update64(pbdev, offset, 1)) { >> + return; >> + } > > Hm, one thing that I don't quite like about the update code is the odd > split between fmb_do_update() (which always updates one value) and > fmb_do_update64() (which may update multiple values). > > What does the code look like if you: > - have a fmb_do_update() that can also handle 64bit values, > - have the update of the counters loop and break out if you get an > error? > > Of course, you may have already tried that ;) If it looks ugly, I don't > have a real issue with this code, either. It looks better. I change it for this simpler form: same fmb_do_update() for all sizes. I do not know why I chose the hard way. Must be some kind of Wile E. Coyote complex. I post a V4 > >> + >> + timer_mod(pbdev->fmb_timer, t + DEFAULT_MUI); >> +} >> + >> int mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint64_t fiba, uint8_t ar, >> uintptr_t ra) >> { > -- Pierre Morel Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common fmb 2018-12-14 16:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common fmb Pierre Morel 2018-12-14 16:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common function measurement block Pierre Morel @ 2018-12-17 9:07 ` Cornelia Huck 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Cornelia Huck @ 2018-12-17 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pierre Morel Cc: walling, borntraeger, rth, david, qemu-s390x, qemu-devel, pasic, thuth On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:53:41 +0100 Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > After the last review round I worked on endianness. > Doing this I found some errors in the code and in the interpretation > of the documentation. > > The new patch changed the following from previous version: > > In s390-pci-bus: > - Initialize the FMB Format. > > In s390-pci-bus.h > - re-organization of the internal counters, having a table for the > internal counters. > > In s390-pci-inst.c > - Internal counters update (LD/ST/STB/RPCIT) is done always. > even if the FMB if fmb_addr is NULL. > AFAIU this respect the documentation which only states that FMB > update is stopped. > - in mpcifc_service_call(), moved the setting of fmb_addr after > the timer has been stopped. > - fmb_update((), use address_space_stq_be() to handle endianness > when storing the FMB. > - define the format with 32 bits instead of one char and reserved > chars, this is easier to handle the FMB copy. > - No update of the DMA fields inside the FMB, as stipulated by the > documentation when format32 is 0. > > Patch is tested (for the good case) on Z(KVM) and X(TCG). Yes, the values look sane for virtio-pci devices under tcg as well. Will review and hopefully apply later. > > Yi Min Zhao (1): > s390x/pci: add common function measurement block > > hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 +- > hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 29 ++++++++++ > hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h | 1 + > 4 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-18 17:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-12-14 16:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common fmb Pierre Morel 2018-12-14 16:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common function measurement block Pierre Morel 2018-12-18 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck 2018-12-18 17:20 ` Pierre Morel 2018-12-17 9:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/pci: add common fmb Cornelia Huck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).