qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width.
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:58:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181218095745-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181218155536.2b35a037@Igors-MacBook-Pro.local>

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 03:55:36PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:27:23 +0800
> Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 02:17:40PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:05:38 +0800
> > > Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Currently, vIOMMU is using the value of IOVA address width, instead of
> > > > the host address width(HAW) to calculate the number of reserved bits in
> > > > data structures such as root entries, context entries, and entries of
> > > > DMA paging structures etc.
> > > > 
> > > > However values of IOVA address width and of the HAW may not equal. For
> > > > example, a 48-bit IOVA can only be mapped to host addresses no wider than
> > > > 46 bits. Using 48, instead of 46 to calculate the reserved bit may result
> > > > in an invalid IOVA being accepted.
> > > > 
> > > > To fix this, a new field - haw_bits is introduced in struct IntelIOMMUState,
> > > > whose value is initialized based on the maximum physical address set to
> > > > guest CPU.
> > > 
> > > > Also, definitions such as VTD_HOST_AW_39/48BIT etc. are renamed
> > > > to clarify.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > > @@ -3100,6 +3104,8 @@ static void vtd_iommu_replay(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr, IOMMUNotifier *n)
> > > >  static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> > > >  {
> > > >      X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s);
> > > > +    CPUState *cs = first_cpu;
> > > > +    X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
> > > >  
> > > >      memset(s->csr, 0, DMAR_REG_SIZE);
> > > >      memset(s->wmask, 0, DMAR_REG_SIZE);
> > > > @@ -3119,23 +3125,24 @@ static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> > > >      s->cap = VTD_CAP_FRO | VTD_CAP_NFR | VTD_CAP_ND |
> > > >               VTD_CAP_MAMV | VTD_CAP_PSI | VTD_CAP_SLLPS |
> > > >               VTD_CAP_SAGAW_39bit | VTD_CAP_MGAW(s->aw_bits);
> > > > -    if (s->aw_bits == VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT) {
> > > > +    if (s->aw_bits == VTD_AW_48BIT) {
> > > >          s->cap |= VTD_CAP_SAGAW_48bit;
> > > >      }
> > > >      s->ecap = VTD_ECAP_QI | VTD_ECAP_IRO;
> > > > +    s->haw_bits = cpu->phys_bits;
> > > Is it possible to avoid accessing CPU fields directly or cpu altogether
> > > and set phys_bits when iommu is created?
> > 
> > Thanks for your comments, Igor.
> > 
> > Well, I guess you prefer not to query the CPU capabilities while deciding
> > the vIOMMU features. But to me, they are not that irrelevant.:)
> > 
> > Here the hardware address width in vt-d, and the one in cpuid.MAXPHYSADDR
> > are referring to the same concept. In VM, both are the maximum guest physical
> > address width. If we do not check the CPU field here, we will still have to
> > check the CPU field in other places such as build_dmar_q35(), and reset the
> > s->haw_bits again.
> > 
> > Is this explanation convincing enough? :)
> current build_dmar_q35() doesn't do it, it's all new code in this series that
> contains not acceptable direct access from one device (iommu) to another (cpu).   
> Proper way would be for the owner of iommu to fish limits from somewhere and set
> values during iommu creation.

Maybe it's a good idea to add documentation for now.

It would be nice not to push this stuff up the stack,
it's unfortunate that our internal APIs make it hard.


> > > 
> > > Perhaps Eduardo
> > >  can suggest better approach, since he's more familiar with phys_bits topic
> > 
> > @Eduardo, any comments? Thanks!
> > 
> > > 
> > > >      /*
> > > >       * Rsvd field masks for spte
> > > >       */
> > > >      vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[0] = ~0ULL;
> > > > -    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[1] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> > > > -    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[2] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> > > > -    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[3] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> > > > -    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[4] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> > > > -    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[5] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> > > > -    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[6] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> > > > -    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[7] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> > > > -    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[8] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
> > > > +    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[1] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> > > > +    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[2] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> > > > +    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[3] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> > > > +    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[4] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> > > > +    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[5] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> > > > +    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[6] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> > > > +    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[7] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> > > > +    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[8] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->haw_bits);
> > > >  
> > > >      if (x86_iommu->intr_supported) {
> > > >          s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_IR | VTD_ECAP_MHMV;
> > > > @@ -3261,10 +3268,10 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s, Error **errp)
> > > >      }
> > > >  
> > > >      /* Currently only address widths supported are 39 and 48 bits */
> > > > -    if ((s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT) &&
> > > > -        (s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT)) {
> > > > +    if ((s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_39BIT) &&
> > > > +        (s->aw_bits != VTD_AW_48BIT)) {
> > > >          error_setg(errp, "Supported values for x-aw-bits are: %d, %d",
> > > > -                   VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT, VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT);
> > > > +                   VTD_AW_39BIT, VTD_AW_48BIT);
> > > >          return false;
> > > >      }
> > > >  
> > > > diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> > > > index ed4e758..820451c 100644
> > > > --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> > > > +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> > > > @@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
> > > >  #define VTD_SID_TO_DEVFN(sid)       ((sid) & 0xff)
> > > >  
> > > >  #define DMAR_REG_SIZE               0x230
> > > > -#define VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT           39
> > > > -#define VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT           48
> > > > -#define VTD_HOST_ADDRESS_WIDTH      VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT
> > > > +#define VTD_AW_39BIT                39
> > > > +#define VTD_AW_48BIT                48
> > > > +#define VTD_ADDRESS_WIDTH           VTD_AW_39BIT
> > > >  #define VTD_HAW_MASK(aw)            ((1ULL << (aw)) - 1)
> > > >  
> > > >  #define DMAR_REPORT_F_INTR          (1)
> > > > @@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ struct IntelIOMMUState {
> > > >      bool intr_eime;                 /* Extended interrupt mode enabled */
> > > >      OnOffAuto intr_eim;             /* Toggle for EIM cabability */
> > > >      bool buggy_eim;                 /* Force buggy EIM unless eim=off */
> > > > -    uint8_t aw_bits;                /* Host/IOVA address width (in bits) */
> > > > +    uint8_t aw_bits;                /* IOVA address width (in bits) */
> > > > +    uint8_t haw_bits;               /* Hardware address width (in bits) */
> > > >  
> > > >      /*
> > > >       * Protects IOMMU states in general.  Currently it protects the
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > B.R.
> > Yu

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-18 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-12 13:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] intel-iommu: add support for 5-level virtual IOMMU Yu Zhang
2018-12-12 13:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] intel-iommu: differentiate host address width from IOVA address width Yu Zhang
2018-12-17 13:17   ` Igor Mammedov
2018-12-18  9:27     ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-18 14:23       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-18 14:55       ` Igor Mammedov
2018-12-18 14:58         ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-12-19  3:03           ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-19  3:12             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-19  6:28               ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-19 15:30                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-19  2:57         ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-19 10:40           ` Igor Mammedov
2018-12-19 16:47             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-20  5:59               ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-20 21:18             ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-12-21 14:13               ` Igor Mammedov
2018-12-21 16:09                 ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-21 17:04                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-21 17:37                     ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-21 19:02                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-21 20:01                         ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-12-22  1:11                         ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-25 16:56                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-26  5:30                             ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-27 15:14                               ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-12-28  2:32                                 ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-29  1:29                                   ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-01-15  7:13                                     ` Yu Zhang
2019-01-18  7:10                                       ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-27 14:54                 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-12-28 11:42                   ` Igor Mammedov
2018-12-20 20:58       ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-12-12 13:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] intel-iommu: extend VTD emulation to allow 57-bit " Yu Zhang
2018-12-17 13:29   ` Igor Mammedov
2018-12-18  9:47     ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-18 10:01       ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-18 12:43         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-18 13:45           ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-18 14:49             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-19  3:40               ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-19  4:35                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-19  5:57                   ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-19 15:23                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-20  5:49                       ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-20 18:28                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-21 16:19                           ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-21 17:15                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-21 17:34                               ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-21 18:10                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-22  0:41                                   ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-25 17:00                                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-12-26  5:58                                       ` Yu Zhang
2018-12-25  1:59                                 ` Tian, Kevin
2018-12-14  9:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] intel-iommu: add support for 5-level virtual IOMMU Yu Zhang
2019-01-15  4:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-15  7:27   ` Yu Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181218095745-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).