From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54493) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZYab-0007KE-6u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:56:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZYaX-0005Ik-NV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:56:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:56:10 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Message-ID: <20181219095610.GB20465@redhat.com> Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= References: <20181218115615.1499-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20181218115615.1499-11-philmd@redhat.com> <20f62f62-f677-6d0f-09dc-3759cc813d8f@redhat.com> <20181218152239.GB19442@habkost.net> <94e8bd71-302e-bced-665d-78538ea3aba3@redhat.com> <2ae5b6cd-7227-fab5-1bd1-4d3ebb88feee@redhat.com> <20181218155731.GC19442@habkost.net> <20181218191343.GE19442@habkost.net> <99b7b806-b18a-8c59-b4f5-ff04ffe3da6e@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <99b7b806-b18a-8c59-b4f5-ff04ffe3da6e@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/12] MAINTAINERS: Orphanize the 'CPU (QOM)' subsystem List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Eduardo Habkost , Thomas Huth , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Mark Cave-Ayland , Cornelia Huck , Richard Henderson , Markus Armbruster , Helge Deller , Artyom Tarasenko , Alex Williamson , Luc Michel , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Igor Mammedov On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:22:39PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 18/12/18 20:13, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 06:15:06PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> On 18/12/18 16:57, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:44:25PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > >>>> On 2018-12-18 16:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > >>>>> Hi Paolo, Eduardo, > >>>>> > >>>>> On 12/18/18 4:22 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>>>>>> On 18/12/18 12:56, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > >>>>>>>> Nobody is looking at those files, downgrade this subsystem as = orphan. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Remove the qemu-devel@nongnu.org entry because the list is alw= ays > >>>>>>>> selected by the 'All patches CC here' section. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster > >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 > >>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 +-- > >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > >>>>>>>> index e50f8c6b97..e6a73820f1 100644 > >>>>>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >>>>>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >>>>>>>> @@ -1745,8 +1745,7 @@ S: Supported > >>>>>>>> F: scripts/coverity-model.c > >>>>>>>> =20 > >>>>>>>> CPU > >>>>>>>> -L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > >>>>>>>> -S: Supported > >>>>>>>> +S: Orphan > >>>>>>>> F: qom/cpu.c > >>>>>>>> F: include/qom/cpu.h > >>>>>>>> =20 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I don't think that's accurate. Simply there's not much going o= n. If > >>>>>>> patches are sent, get-maintainers's git fallback will do someth= ing > >>>>>>> (probably sending the patch to Eduardo, Igor or me). > >>>>> > >>>>> I followed Markus suggestion from > >>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg05414.ht= ml: > >>>>> > >>>>> If we take the definition of S: in MAINTAINERS seriously, > >>>>> we need to appoint a maintainer (a person, not a mailing list), > >>>>> or downgrade to S: Orphan. > >>>> > >>>> I agree with Markus and Philippe. Having "S: Supported" but no nam= es > >>>> available is just confusing. So either put a maintainer name in he= re, or > >>>> downgrade to "Orphan". > >>> > >>> I volunteer to maintain it, but I don't want to be the only > >>> maintainer. Any other volunteer? > >> > >> I can volunteer since I'd take the patches anyway. We can also mark= it > >> as Odd Fixes, and also make it a single thing with all of qom/ and > >> include/qom/. > >=20 > > Actually, I consider qom/cpu.c distinct from QOM core, and I was > > planning to move it to hw/cpu, and add hw/cpu/core.c to the same > > section. > >=20 > > Anyway, I guess this means you're also volunteering to be listed > > as QOM maintainer? >=20 > Igor and Daniel, would you co-maintain or review it? I'm fine being listed as a manitainer for qom/, agree with moving qom/cpu.c to hw/cpu, as I was going to suggest that myself :-) Regards, Daniel --=20 |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberran= ge :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.c= om :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberran= ge :|