From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZvOC-0007BB-GY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 05:17:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZvO8-0005uT-BC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 05:17:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZvO8-0005tX-5a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 05:17:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D3E8E583 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 18:16:58 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20181220101658.GA24875@xz-x1> References: <20181220054037.24320-1-peterx@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] q35: change defaults for kernel irqchip and IR List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Eduardo Habkost , Igor Mammedov On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:00:21AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 20/12/18 06:40, Peter Xu wrote: > > For old versions of QEMU: we used machine compat properties. > > > > For old kernels (<4.4): if user didn't specify split kernel irqchip, > > we'll take it only as the first priority if it's supported by the > > kernel; otherwise, we will continue with complete kernel irqchip. > > > > Both of these parameters should be good to have (split irqchip gains > > more security, while IR gets it too but even more, like x2apic). So > > let's try to make them as default if capable. > > This is not correct anymore, but the commit message in patch 1 is > correct, so Indeed; I should remove the old cover letter to avoid confusion. > > Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini Thanks! -- Peter Xu