From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48893) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaHDi-0008Mq-BQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 04:35:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaHDh-00074G-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 04:35:50 -0500 From: John Snow Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 04:35:19 -0500 Message-Id: <20181221093529.23855-2-jsnow@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20181221093529.23855-1-jsnow@redhat.com> References: <20181221093529.23855-1-jsnow@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 01/11] blockdev: abort transactions in reverse order List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: eblake@redhat.com, Max Reitz , Fam Zheng , vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, John Snow , Kevin Wolf , Markus Armbruster Presently, we abort transactions in the same order they were processed in. Bitmap commands, though, attempt to restore backup data structures on abort. That's not valid, they need to be aborted in reverse chronological order. Replace the QSIMPLEQ data structure with a QTAILQ one, so we can iterate in reverse for the abort phase of the transaction. Signed-off-by: John Snow Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy --- blockdev.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c index a6f71f9d83..43e4c22da5 100644 --- a/blockdev.c +++ b/blockdev.c @@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ struct BlkActionState { const BlkActionOps *ops; JobTxn *block_job_txn; TransactionProperties *txn_props; - QSIMPLEQ_ENTRY(BlkActionState) entry; + QTAILQ_ENTRY(BlkActionState) entry; }; /* internal snapshot private data */ @@ -2266,8 +2266,8 @@ void qmp_transaction(TransactionActionList *dev_list, BlkActionState *state, *next; Error *local_err = NULL; - QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(snap_bdrv_states, BlkActionState) snap_bdrv_states; - QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&snap_bdrv_states); + QTAILQ_HEAD(snap_bdrv_states, BlkActionState) snap_bdrv_states; + QTAILQ_INIT(&snap_bdrv_states); /* Does this transaction get canceled as a group on failure? * If not, we don't really need to make a JobTxn. @@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ void qmp_transaction(TransactionActionList *dev_list, state->action = dev_info; state->block_job_txn = block_job_txn; state->txn_props = props; - QSIMPLEQ_INSERT_TAIL(&snap_bdrv_states, state, entry); + QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&snap_bdrv_states, state, entry); state->ops->prepare(state, &local_err); if (local_err) { @@ -2307,7 +2307,7 @@ void qmp_transaction(TransactionActionList *dev_list, } } - QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(state, &snap_bdrv_states, entry) { + QTAILQ_FOREACH(state, &snap_bdrv_states, entry) { if (state->ops->commit) { state->ops->commit(state); } @@ -2318,13 +2318,13 @@ void qmp_transaction(TransactionActionList *dev_list, delete_and_fail: /* failure, and it is all-or-none; roll back all operations */ - QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(state, &snap_bdrv_states, entry) { + QTAILQ_FOREACH_REVERSE(state, &snap_bdrv_states, snap_bdrv_states, entry) { if (state->ops->abort) { state->ops->abort(state); } } exit: - QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH_SAFE(state, &snap_bdrv_states, entry, next) { + QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(state, &snap_bdrv_states, entry, next) { if (state->ops->clean) { state->ops->clean(state); } -- 2.17.2