From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44355) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gau0x-00050Z-I5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 22:01:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gau0w-0005kp-KW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 22:01:15 -0500 From: yuchenlin Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 10:59:37 +0800 Message-Id: <20181223025939.15775-2-npes87184@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20181223025939.15775-1-npes87184@gmail.com> References: <20181223025939.15775-1-npes87184@gmail.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] dmg: fix binary search List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: stefanha@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, yuchenlin There is a possible hang in original binary search implementation. That is if chunk1 = 4, chunk2 = 5, chunk3 = 4, and we go else case. The chunk1 will be still 4, and so on. Signed-off-by: yuchenlin --- block/dmg.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/dmg.c b/block/dmg.c index 50e91aef6d..0e05702f5d 100644 --- a/block/dmg.c +++ b/block/dmg.c @@ -572,14 +572,14 @@ static inline uint32_t search_chunk(BDRVDMGState *s, uint64_t sector_num) { /* binary search */ uint32_t chunk1 = 0, chunk2 = s->n_chunks, chunk3; - while (chunk1 != chunk2) { + while (chunk1 <= chunk2) { chunk3 = (chunk1 + chunk2) / 2; if (s->sectors[chunk3] > sector_num) { - chunk2 = chunk3; + chunk2 = chunk3 - 1; } else if (s->sectors[chunk3] + s->sectorcounts[chunk3] > sector_num) { return chunk3; } else { - chunk1 = chunk3; + chunk1 = chunk3 + 1; } } return s->n_chunks; /* error */ -- 2.17.1