From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: walling@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net,
david@redhat.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] s390x/pci: add common function measurement block
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 15:39:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190104153901.0bd2f703.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546510620-6707-2-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:17:00 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> +static void fmb_update(void *opaque)
> +{
> + S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev = opaque;
> + int64_t t = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL);
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Update U bit */
> + pbdev->fmb.last_update *= 2;
> + pbdev->fmb.last_update |= UPDATE_U_BIT;
> + if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, offsetof(ZpciFmb, last_update),
> + pbdev->fmb.last_update,
> + sizeof(((ZpciFmb *)0)->last_update))) {
I really don't want to be a pain, but... this looks weird. Why not
simply sizeof(pbdev->fmb.last_update)?
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update FMB sample count */
> + if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, offsetof(ZpciFmb, sample),
> + pbdev->fmb.sample++,
> + sizeof(((ZpciFmb *)0)->sample))) {
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update FMB counters */
> + for (i = 0; i < ZPCI_FMB_CNT_MAX; i++) {
> + if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, offsetof(ZpciFmb, counter[i]),
> + pbdev->fmb.counter[i],
> + sizeof(((ZpciFmb *)0)->counter[0]))) {
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Clear U bit and update the time */
> + pbdev->fmb.last_update = time2tod(qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL));
> + pbdev->fmb.last_update *= 2;
> + if (fmb_do_update(pbdev, offsetof(ZpciFmb, last_update),
> + pbdev->fmb.last_update,
> + sizeof(((ZpciFmb *)0)->last_update))) {
> + return;
> + }
> + timer_mod(pbdev->fmb_timer, t + DEFAULT_MUI);
> +}
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-04 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-03 10:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] s390x/pci: add common fmb Pierre Morel
2019-01-03 10:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] s390x/pci: add common function measurement block Pierre Morel
2019-01-04 14:39 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-01-07 9:08 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 9:11 ` Thomas Huth
2019-01-07 9:22 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 11:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-01-08 17:29 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-09 11:27 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190104153901.0bd2f703.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).