From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] vfio: retry one more time conditionally for type1 unmap
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:53:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190109025348.GA12837@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190108082350.1f4902f4@x1.home>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:23:50AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 19:47:20 +0800
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > In Linux version v4.15+ there's a bug (introduced in 71a7d3d78e3c,
> > "vfio/type1: silence integer overflow warning", 2017-10-20) that could
> > potentially reject a valid unmap region that covers exactly the whole
> > u64 address space (like iova=0xfef00000, size=2^64-0xfef00000).
> > Besides a fix on the kernel side, QEMU also needs to live well even
> > with the old kernels. When booting a guest with both vfio-pci and
> > intel-iommu device, we can see error dumped:
> >
> > qemu-kvm: VFIO_UNMAP_DMA: -22
> > qemu-kvm: vfio_dma_unmap(0x561f059948f0, 0xfef00000,
> > 0xffffffff01100000) = -22 (Invalid argument)
> >
> > This patch gives another shot of the UNMAP ioctl if the specific error
> > was detected, while in the second UNMAP ioctl we skip the last page
> > assuming that it's never used. In our case, currently only Intel VT-d
> > is using this code and it should never use the iova address
> > 2^64-4096 (so far largest supported GAW is 57 bits) so ignoring that
> > page should be fine.
> >
> > After this patch is applied, the errors go away.
> >
> > Reported-by: Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662291
> > Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/vfio/common.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > hw/vfio/trace-events | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
> > index 7c185e5a2e..7f8de5b7a5 100644
> > --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
> > +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
> > @@ -221,6 +221,22 @@ static int vfio_dma_unmap(VFIOContainer *container,
> > };
> >
> > if (ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA, &unmap)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Give it another shot due to a bug in kernel (v4.15-v4.20)
> > + * that could potentially reject a region that exactly covers
> > + * the whole u64 address space (71a7d3d78e3c, "vfio/type1:
> > + * silence integer overflow warning", 2017-10-20). If that
> > + * happens, we retry for one more time assuming that the last
> > + * page of the address space (2^64-getpagesize()) has already
> > + * been dropped.
> > + */
> > + if (errno == EINVAL && unmap.size && unmap.iova + unmap.size == 0) {
> > + trace_vfio_dma_unmap_workaround_overflow();
> > + unmap.size -= getpagesize();
> > + if (ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA, &unmap) == 0) {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > error_report("VFIO_UNMAP_DMA: %d", -errno);
> > return -errno;
> > }
> > diff --git a/hw/vfio/trace-events b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> > index a85e8662ea..2c9db4fb9a 100644
> > --- a/hw/vfio/trace-events
> > +++ b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> > @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ vfio_region_mmaps_set_enabled(const char *name, bool enabled) "Region %s mmaps e
> > vfio_region_sparse_mmap_header(const char *name, int index, int nr_areas) "Device %s region %d: %d sparse mmap entries"
> > vfio_region_sparse_mmap_entry(int i, unsigned long start, unsigned long end) "sparse entry %d [0x%lx - 0x%lx]"
> > vfio_get_dev_region(const char *name, int index, uint32_t type, uint32_t subtype) "%s index %d, %08x/%0x8"
> > +vfio_dma_unmap_workaround_overflow(void) ""
> >
> > # hw/vfio/platform.c
> > vfio_platform_base_device_init(char *name, int groupid) "%s belongs to group #%d"
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I was working on a slightly different version:
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
> index 7c185e5a2e79..9f5a140cb1c3 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,24 @@ static int vfio_dma_unmap(VFIOContainer *container,
> .size = size,
> };
>
> - if (ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA, &unmap)) {
> + while (ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA, &unmap)) {
> + /*
> + * The type1 backend has an off-by-one bug in the kernel (71a7d3d78e3c
> + * v4.15) where its overflow check prevents us from unmapping the last
> + * page of the address space. Test for the error condition and re-try
> + * the unmap excluding the last page. The expectation is that we've
> + * never mapped the last page anyway and this unmap request comes via
> + * vIOMMU support which also makes it unlikely that this page is used.
> + * This bug was introduced well after type1 v2 support was introduced,
> + * so we shouldn't need to test for v1. A fix is proposed for kernel
> + * v5.0 so this workaround can be removed once affected kernels are
> + * sufficiently deprecated.
> + */
> + if (errno == EINVAL && unmap.size && !(unmap.iova + unmap.size) &&
> + container->iommu_type == VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU) {
> + unmap.size -= 1ULL << ctz64(container->pgsizes);
> + continue;
> + }
> error_report("VFIO_UNMAP_DMA: %d", -errno);
> return -errno;
> }
>
> I like your addition of tracing, but I prefer the type1v2 test (the
> bug is specific to the type1 backend) and using the iommu minimum page
> size rather than the cpu page size. Do you want to incorporate or
> would you prefer I post mine? Thanks,
Hi, Alex,
I think the type check and using the container->pgsizes are better!
Please use your version, I'll simply drop mine from the series.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-08 11:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] intel_iommu: misc fixes for error exposed after error_report_once() Peter Xu
2019-01-08 11:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] intel_iommu: fix operator in vtd_switch_address_space Peter Xu
2019-01-11 4:03 ` Jason Wang
2019-01-08 11:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] intel_iommu: reset intr_enabled when system reset Peter Xu
2019-01-11 4:04 ` Jason Wang
2019-01-08 11:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] pci/msi: export msi_is_masked() Peter Xu
2019-01-08 11:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] i386/kvm: ignore masked irqs when update msi routes Peter Xu
2019-01-08 11:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] vfio: retry one more time conditionally for type1 unmap Peter Xu
2019-01-08 15:23 ` Alex Williamson
2019-01-09 2:53 ` Peter Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190109025348.GA12837@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).