From: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Should the "props" be documented for QMP `object-add`?
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 12:21:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190109112125.GO3259@paraplu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109110208.GH3998@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:02:08AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 09:51:13AM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
[...]
> > That said, in qapi/misc.json "@object-add" doesn't document any of the
> > "props". Is it on purpose? Maybe because it is a 1:1 mapping of the
> > command-line `-object` (which _is_ documented in qemu-doc.texi).
> >
> > Is it a good idea to send a patch to document the "props" in
> > qapi/misc.json? Or would it be needless duplication?
>
> It is not practical at this time because object_add uses QOM object
> properties and these are exclusively defined in code, not QAPI schema.
>
> There's a long term todo item to use QAPI schema to define QOM objects,
> which would then auto-generate the boilerplate QOM code, at which point
> it all becomes self-documenting.
Didn't know about this; thanks for the background. Then, I'll hold off
submitting any patch to qapi/misc.json.
> That's basically lacking dev resources to work on it though...
Noted.
[...]
--
/kashyap
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 8:51 [Qemu-devel] Should the "props" be documented for QMP `object-add`? Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-01-09 10:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-01-09 10:44 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-01-09 11:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-01-09 11:21 ` Kashyap Chamarthy [this message]
2019-01-09 13:01 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190109112125.GO3259@paraplu.home \
--to=kchamart@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).