From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/2] include/hw/ppc: Fix compilation with clang -std=gnu99
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 18:47:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190109184745.1e61b5bf@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab4e0a6a-3a9f-8f27-a86e-e283bb737cf7@kaod.org>
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 18:40:48 +0100
Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote:
> On 1/9/19 6:28 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:13:01PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 1/9/19 5:39 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >>> When compiling with Clang and -std=gnu99, I get the following errors:
> >>>
> >>> CC ppc64-softmmu/hw/intc/xics_spapr.o
> >>> In file included from hw/intc/xics_spapr.c:34:
> >>> include/hw/ppc/xics.h:46:25: error: redefinition of typedef 'ICSState' is a C11 feature
> >>> [-Werror,-Wtypedef-redefinition]
> >>> typedef struct ICSState ICSState;
> >>> ^
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h:18:25: note: previous definition is here
> >>> typedef struct ICSState ICSState;
> >>> ^
> >>> In file included from hw/intc/xics_spapr.c:34:
> >>> include/hw/ppc/xics.h:203:34: error: redefinition of typedef 'sPAPRMachineState' is a C11 feature
> >>> [-Werror,-Wtypedef-redefinition]
> >>> typedef struct sPAPRMachineState sPAPRMachineState;
> >>> ^
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h:25:34: note: previous definition is here
> >>> typedef struct sPAPRMachineState sPAPRMachineState;
> >>> ^
> >>> CC ppc64-softmmu/hw/intc/spapr_xive.o
> >>> In file included from hw/intc/spapr_xive.c:19:
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h:38:3: error: redefinition of typedef 'sPAPRXive' is a C11 feature
> >>> [-Werror,-Wtypedef-redefinition]
> >>> } sPAPRXive;
> >>> ^
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h:20:26: note: previous definition is here
> >>> typedef struct sPAPRXive sPAPRXive;
> >>> ^
> >>> In file included from hw/intc/spapr_xive.c:19:
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h:45:34: error: redefinition of typedef 'sPAPRMachineState' is a C11 feature
> >>> [-Werror,-Wtypedef-redefinition]
> >>> typedef struct sPAPRMachineState sPAPRMachineState;
> >>> ^
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h:25:34: note: previous definition is here
> >>> typedef struct sPAPRMachineState sPAPRMachineState;
> >>> ^
> >>> CC ppc64-softmmu/hw/char/spapr_vty.o
> >>> In file included from hw/char/spapr_vty.c:8:
> >>> In file included from include/hw/ppc/spapr.h:12:
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h:45:34: error: redefinition of typedef 'sPAPRMachineState' is a C11 feature
> >>> [-Werror,-Wtypedef-redefinition]
> >>> typedef struct sPAPRMachineState sPAPRMachineState;
> >>> ^
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h:25:34: note: previous definition is here
> >>> typedef struct sPAPRMachineState sPAPRMachineState;
> >>> ^
> >>>
> >>> Since we're going to make -std=gnu99 mandatory, fix these issues
> >>> by including the right header files indead of typedeffing stuff twice.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 4 ++--
> >>> include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h | 2 +-
> >>> include/hw/ppc/xics.h | 4 ++--
> >>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >>> index 2c77a8b..6a5ae4f 100644
> >>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >>> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> >>> #include "hw/mem/pc-dimm.h"
> >>> #include "hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h"
> >>> #include "hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h"
> >>> +#include "hw/ppc/xics.h"
> >>> +#include "hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h"
> >>>
> >>> struct VIOsPAPRBus;
> >>> struct sPAPRPHBState;
> >>> @@ -15,8 +17,6 @@ struct sPAPRNVRAM;
> >>> typedef struct sPAPREventLogEntry sPAPREventLogEntry;
> >>> typedef struct sPAPREventSource sPAPREventSource;
> >>> typedef struct sPAPRPendingHPT sPAPRPendingHPT;
> >>> -typedef struct ICSState ICSState;
> >>> -typedef struct sPAPRXive sPAPRXive;
> >>>
> >>> #define HPTE64_V_HPTE_DIRTY 0x0000000000000040ULL
> >>> #define SPAPR_ENTRY_POINT 0x100
> >>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h
> >>> index 728735d..aff4366 100644
> >>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h
> >>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h
> >>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_irq_free(sPAPRXive *xive, uint32_t lisn);
> >>> void spapr_xive_pic_print_info(sPAPRXive *xive, Monitor *mon);
> >>> qemu_irq spapr_xive_qirq(sPAPRXive *xive, uint32_t lisn);
> >>>
> >>> -typedef struct sPAPRMachineState sPAPRMachineState;
> >>> +#include "hw/ppc/spapr.h" /* for sPAPRMachineState */
> >>
> >> so both files include each other, how nice ...
> >
> > If the header files are mutually dependent it makes me wonder what the
> > point of having them split up is ?
>
> The XICS interrupt controller models are used in two different machines,
> sPAPR and PowerNV.
>
> > Feels like either they need to be merged, or they need to be split up
> > and refactored even more to remove the mutual dependancy.
>
> yes or that some spapr_* definitions do not belong to the common xics.h
> file.
Yeah,
These should move to a new xics_spapr.h or maybe even spapr.h for simplicity:
void spapr_dt_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t nr_servers, void *fdt,
uint32_t phandle);
int xics_kvm_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
void xics_spapr_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr);
>
> Thanks,
>
> C.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 16:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] Force the C standard to gnu99 Thomas Huth
2019-01-09 16:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] include/hw/ppc: Fix compilation with clang -std=gnu99 Thomas Huth
2019-01-09 17:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Cédric Le Goater
2019-01-09 17:28 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-01-09 17:40 ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-01-09 17:47 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2019-01-10 6:47 ` Thomas Huth
2019-01-09 21:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-01-09 21:25 ` Eric Blake
2019-01-09 21:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-01-10 10:12 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-01-10 12:12 ` Greg Kurz
2019-01-10 6:46 ` Thomas Huth
2019-01-09 17:46 ` Cédric Le Goater
2019-01-09 16:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] configure: Force the C standard to gnu99 Thomas Huth
2019-01-09 18:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-01-09 21:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-01-10 6:50 ` Thomas Huth
2019-01-09 21:23 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190109184745.1e61b5bf@bahia.lan \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).