From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: cota@braap.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests: use g_usleep instead of rem = sleep(time)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:46:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190114104641.19186-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> (raw)
Relying on sleep to always return having slept isn't safe as a signal
may have occurred. If signals are constantly incoming the program will
never reach it's termination condition. This is believed to be the
mechanism causing time outs for qht-test in Travis.
The glib g_usleep() deals with all of this for us so lets use it instead.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
tests/atomic64-bench.c | 6 ++----
tests/atomic_add-bench.c | 6 ++----
tests/qht-bench.c | 6 ++----
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/atomic64-bench.c b/tests/atomic64-bench.c
index 71692560ed..121a8c14f4 100644
--- a/tests/atomic64-bench.c
+++ b/tests/atomic64-bench.c
@@ -74,16 +74,14 @@ static void *thread_func(void *arg)
static void run_test(void)
{
- unsigned int remaining;
unsigned int i;
while (atomic_read(&n_ready_threads) != n_threads) {
cpu_relax();
}
+
atomic_set(&test_start, true);
- do {
- remaining = sleep(duration);
- } while (remaining);
+ g_usleep(duration * G_USEC_PER_SEC);
atomic_set(&test_stop, true);
for (i = 0; i < n_threads; i++) {
diff --git a/tests/atomic_add-bench.c b/tests/atomic_add-bench.c
index 2f6c72f63a..5666f6bbff 100644
--- a/tests/atomic_add-bench.c
+++ b/tests/atomic_add-bench.c
@@ -76,16 +76,14 @@ static void *thread_func(void *arg)
static void run_test(void)
{
- unsigned int remaining;
unsigned int i;
while (atomic_read(&n_ready_threads) != n_threads) {
cpu_relax();
}
+
atomic_set(&test_start, true);
- do {
- remaining = sleep(duration);
- } while (remaining);
+ g_usleep(duration * G_USEC_PER_SEC);
atomic_set(&test_stop, true);
for (i = 0; i < n_threads; i++) {
diff --git a/tests/qht-bench.c b/tests/qht-bench.c
index ab4e708180..e3b512f26f 100644
--- a/tests/qht-bench.c
+++ b/tests/qht-bench.c
@@ -398,16 +398,14 @@ static void pr_stats(void)
static void run_test(void)
{
- unsigned int remaining;
int i;
while (atomic_read(&n_ready_threads) != n_rw_threads + n_rz_threads) {
cpu_relax();
}
+
atomic_set(&test_start, true);
- do {
- remaining = sleep(duration);
- } while (remaining);
+ g_usleep(duration * G_USEC_PER_SEC);
atomic_set(&test_stop, true);
for (i = 0; i < n_rw_threads; i++) {
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-14 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-14 10:46 Alex Bennée [this message]
2019-01-14 13:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests: use g_usleep instead of rem = sleep(time) Peter Maydell
2019-01-14 14:13 ` Emilio G. Cota
2019-01-15 21:22 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190114104641.19186-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=cota@braap.org \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).