From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35197)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1gjUyT-0007a7-Lm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:06:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1gjUyP-0003MN-0X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:06:12 -0500
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:05:27 -0500
From: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org>
Message-ID: <20190115200527.GB7844@flamenco>
References: <30917d5b-f8cb-e799-6c3e-3202195122b4@redhat.com>
	<871s5fp54s.fsf@linaro.org>
	<e94b51d7-c90f-b599-fb68-ea8c2603989b@redhat.com>
	<87zhs3nk1m.fsf@linaro.org>
	<a0646a85-603d-99a8-c676-76e43a42e0fb@twiddle.net>
	<87y37monyr.fsf@linaro.org>
	<CAFEAcA8u4AdhW-MF6uMP7=B4iYVO9ZEQCtcQKpN6KWALwAfLnw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87won6nfl1.fsf@linaro.org>
	<6cb80b50-0352-430e-0c46-85ed69f95c88@redhat.com>
	<87va2poqoz.fsf@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <87va2poqoz.fsf@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] include/fpu/softfloat: Fix compilation
 with Clang on s390x
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>, Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= <philmd@redhat.com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 16:01:32 +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Ahh I should have mentioned we already have the technology for this ;-)
> 
> If you build the fpu/next tree on a s390x you can then run:
> 
>   ./tests/fp/fp-bench f64_div
> 
> with and without the CONFIG_128 path. To get an idea of the real world
> impact you can compile a foreign binary and run it on a s390x system
> with:
> 
>   $QEMU ./tests/fp/fp-bench f64_div -t host
> 
> And that will give you the peak performance assuming your program is
> doing nothing but f64_div operations. If the two QEMU's are basically in
> the same ballpark then it doesn't make enough difference. That said:

I think you mean here `tests/fp/fp-bench -o div -p double', otherwise
you'll get the default op (-o add).

Thanks,

		E.