From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjoOt-0004ND-8n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:50:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjoOq-0005MV-AB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:50:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:50:14 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20190116175014.6f6eafe4.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1547467955-17245-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> References: <1547467955-17245-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] include/fpu/softfloat: Fix compilation with Clang on s390x List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: Richard Henderson , Aurelien Jarno , Peter Maydell , Alex =?UTF-8?B?QmVubsOpZQ==?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:12:35 +0100 Thomas Huth wrote: > Clang v7.0.1 does not like the __int128 variable type for inline > assembly on s390x: > > In file included from fpu/softfloat.c:97: > include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h:647:9: error: inline asm error: > This value type register class is not natively supported! > asm("dlgr %0, %1" : "+r"(n) : "r"(d)); > ^ > > Disable this code part there now when compiling with Clang, so that > the generic code gets used instead. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > --- > include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h b/include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h > index b1d772e..bd5b641 100644 > --- a/include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h > +++ b/include/fpu/softfloat-macros.h > @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static inline uint64_t udiv_qrnnd(uint64_t *r, uint64_t n1, > uint64_t q; > asm("divq %4" : "=a"(q), "=d"(*r) : "0"(n0), "1"(n1), "rm"(d)); > return q; > -#elif defined(__s390x__) > +#elif defined(__s390x__) && !defined(__clang__) > /* Need to use a TImode type to get an even register pair for DLGR. */ > unsigned __int128 n = (unsigned __int128)n1 << 64 | n0; > asm("dlgr %0, %1" : "+r"(n) : "r"(d)); Ok, so what's the deal with this patch now? Fix compilation now, optimize later? If yes, should I pick it as an s390x build fix (I plan to send a pull request later this week), or will the fpu maintainers pick it?