From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkGmQ-0004u6-9i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:08:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkGmP-0007FB-DG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:08:58 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:37646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkGmP-0007Bo-3J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:08:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:08:53 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Message-ID: <20190117230853.lbuqljd5srd6wcpu@function> References: <20190117114359.5164-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190117114359.5164-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/27] slirp: make it again a standalone project (part 2) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Zhang Chen , Li Zhijian , pbonzini@redhat.com, Jan Kiszka , Jason Wang Also thinking about it: I guess we'd want to make the usage of libslirp optional, at least because (I guess) at some points the future libslirp may want to change the API (nobody can do something perfect at first try), and when that breaks qemu build it would nasty if people couldn't just disable libslirp usage to get qemu built for needs which don't require slirp. Also some people would really like to see the dreaded slirp stack off their qemu binaries :) Samuel