From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] vfio-ccw: concurrent I/O handling
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:03:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190121110354.2247-3-cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190121110354.2247-1-cohuck@redhat.com>
Rework handling of multiple I/O requests to return -EAGAIN if
we are already processing an I/O request. Introduce a mutex
to disallow concurrent writes to the I/O region.
The expectation is that userspace simply retries the operation
if it gets -EAGAIN.
We currently don't allow multiple ssch requests at the same
time, as we don't have support for keeping channel programs
around for more than one request.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 1 +
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 8 +++-----
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index a10cec0e86eb..2ef189fe45ed 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ static int vfio_ccw_sch_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
private->sch = sch;
dev_set_drvdata(&sch->dev, private);
+ mutex_init(&private->io_mutex);
spin_lock_irq(sch->lock);
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_NOT_OPER;
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
index cab17865aafe..f6ed934cc565 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ static int fsm_io_helper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
sch = private->sch;
spin_lock_irqsave(sch->lock, flags);
- private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY;
orb = cp_get_orb(&private->cp, (u32)(addr_t)sch, sch->lpm);
@@ -42,6 +41,8 @@ static int fsm_io_helper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
*/
sch->schib.scsw.cmd.actl |= SCSW_ACTL_START_PEND;
ret = 0;
+ /* Don't allow another ssch for now */
+ private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY;
break;
case 1: /* Status pending */
case 2: /* Busy */
@@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ static void fsm_io_error(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
static void fsm_io_busy(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
enum vfio_ccw_event event)
{
- private->io_region->ret_code = -EBUSY;
+ private->io_region->ret_code = -EAGAIN;
}
static void fsm_disabled_irq(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
@@ -130,8 +131,6 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
struct mdev_device *mdev = private->mdev;
char *errstr = "request";
- private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY;
-
memcpy(scsw, io_region->scsw_area, sizeof(*scsw));
if (scsw->cmd.fctl & SCSW_FCTL_START_FUNC) {
@@ -176,7 +175,6 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
}
err_out:
- private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_IDLE;
trace_vfio_ccw_io_fctl(scsw->cmd.fctl, get_schid(private),
io_region->ret_code, errstr);
}
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index f673e106c041..3fa9fc570400 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -169,16 +169,20 @@ static ssize_t vfio_ccw_mdev_read(struct mdev_device *mdev,
{
struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
struct ccw_io_region *region;
+ int ret;
if (*ppos + count > sizeof(*region))
return -EINVAL;
private = dev_get_drvdata(mdev_parent_dev(mdev));
+ mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
region = private->io_region;
if (copy_to_user(buf, (void *)region + *ppos, count))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- return count;
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ else
+ ret = count;
+ mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
+ return ret;
}
static ssize_t vfio_ccw_mdev_write(struct mdev_device *mdev,
@@ -188,25 +192,30 @@ static ssize_t vfio_ccw_mdev_write(struct mdev_device *mdev,
{
struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
struct ccw_io_region *region;
+ int ret;
if (*ppos + count > sizeof(*region))
return -EINVAL;
private = dev_get_drvdata(mdev_parent_dev(mdev));
- if (private->state != VFIO_CCW_STATE_IDLE)
+ if (private->state == VFIO_CCW_STATE_NOT_OPER ||
+ private->state == VFIO_CCW_STATE_STANDBY)
return -EACCES;
+ if (!mutex_trylock(&private->io_mutex))
+ return -EAGAIN;
region = private->io_region;
- if (copy_from_user((void *)region + *ppos, buf, count))
- return -EFAULT;
+ if (copy_from_user((void *)region + *ppos, buf, count)) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
vfio_ccw_fsm_event(private, VFIO_CCW_EVENT_IO_REQ);
- if (region->ret_code != 0) {
- private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_IDLE;
- return region->ret_code;
- }
+ ret = (region->ret_code != 0) ? region->ret_code : count;
- return count;
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
+ return ret;
}
static int vfio_ccw_mdev_get_device_info(struct vfio_device_info *info)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
index 08e9a7dc9176..e88237697f83 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
* @mdev: pointer to the mediated device
* @nb: notifier for vfio events
* @io_region: MMIO region to input/output I/O arguments/results
+ * @io_mutex: protect against concurrent update of I/O structures
* @cp: channel program for the current I/O operation
* @irb: irb info received from interrupt
* @scsw: scsw info
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ struct vfio_ccw_private {
struct mdev_device *mdev;
struct notifier_block nb;
struct ccw_io_region *io_region;
+ struct mutex io_mutex;
struct channel_program cp;
struct irb irb;
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-21 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-21 11:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] vfio-ccw: support hsch/csch (kernel part) Cornelia Huck
2019-01-21 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] vfio-ccw: make it safe to access channel programs Cornelia Huck
2019-01-22 14:56 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-22 15:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-21 11:03 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-01-21 20:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] vfio-ccw: concurrent I/O handling Halil Pasic
2019-01-22 10:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-22 11:17 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-22 11:53 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-22 12:46 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-22 17:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-22 19:03 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-23 10:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-23 13:06 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-23 13:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-24 19:16 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-25 10:13 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-22 18:33 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-23 10:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-23 13:30 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-24 10:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-24 10:08 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-24 10:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-24 11:18 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-24 11:45 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-24 19:14 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-25 2:25 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-25 2:37 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-25 10:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-25 12:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-25 14:01 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-25 14:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-25 16:04 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-28 17:13 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-28 19:30 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-29 9:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-29 19:39 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-30 13:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-30 14:32 ` Farhan Ali
2019-01-28 17:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-28 19:15 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-28 21:48 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-29 10:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-29 14:14 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-29 18:53 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-29 10:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-25 15:57 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-28 17:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-28 21:50 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-25 20:22 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-28 17:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-25 13:09 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-25 12:58 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-25 20:21 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-21 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] vfio-ccw: add capabilities chain Cornelia Huck
2019-01-23 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Halil Pasic
2019-01-25 16:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Farman
2019-01-25 21:00 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-28 17:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-21 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] s390/cio: export hsch to modules Cornelia Huck
2019-01-22 15:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Halil Pasic
2019-01-21 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] vfio-ccw: add handling for async channel instructions Cornelia Huck
2019-01-23 15:51 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-24 10:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-24 10:37 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-25 21:00 ` Eric Farman
2019-01-28 17:40 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190121110354.2247-3-cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).