From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/2] tests/virtio-blk: add test for WRITE_ZEROES command
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:12:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190125151245.GD28305@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4aa8b25-f0ad-1444-587c-3d90a8ddc74a@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3934 bytes --]
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:49:03AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2019-01-25 09:16, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 07:07:35AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> On 2019-01-25 07:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >>> On 2019-01-24 18:23, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> >>>> If the WRITE_ZEROES feature is enabled, we check this
> >>>> command in the test_basic().
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> tests/virtio-blk-test.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/tests/virtio-blk-test.c b/tests/virtio-blk-test.c
> >>>> index 04c608764b..8cabbcb85a 100644
> >>>> --- a/tests/virtio-blk-test.c
> >>>> +++ b/tests/virtio-blk-test.c
> >>>> @@ -231,6 +231,69 @@ static void test_basic(QVirtioDevice *dev, QGuestAllocator *alloc,
> >>>>
> >>>> guest_free(alloc, req_addr);
> >>>>
> >>>> + if (features & (1u << VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROES)) {
> >>>> + struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes *dwz_hdr;
> >>>> + void *expected;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * WRITE_ZEROES request on the same sector of previous test where
> >>>> + * we wrote "TEST".
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + req.type = VIRTIO_BLK_T_WRITE_ZEROES;
> >>>> + req.data = g_malloc0(512);
> >>>
> >>> Wouldn't it be more interesting to do a memset(req.data, 0xaa, 512) or
> >>> something similar here, to see whether zeroes or 0xaa is written?
> >>
> >> Ah, never mind, I thought req.data would be a sector buffer here, but
> >> looking at the lines below, it apparently is something different.
> >>
> >> Why do you allocate 512 bytes here? I'd rather expect
> >> g_malloc0(sizeof(struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes)) here. ... and
> >> then you could also use a local "struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes
> >> dwz_hdr" variable instead of a pointer, and drop the g_malloc0() completely?
> >>
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> > it was my initial implementation, but on the first test I discovered
> > that virtio_blk_request() has an assert on the data_size and it requires
> > a multiple of 512 bytes.
> > Then I looked at the virtio-spec #1, and it seems that data should be
> > multiple of 512 bytes also if it contains the struct
> > virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes. (I'm not sure)
> >
> > Anyway I tried to allocate only the space for that struct, commented the
> > assert and the test works well.
> >
> > How do you suggest to proceed?
>
> Wow, that's a tough question. Looking at the virtio spec, I agree with
> you, it looks like struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes should be
> padded to 512 bytes here. But when I look at the Linux sources
> (drivers/block/virtio_blk.c), I fail to see that they are doing the
> padding there (but maybe I'm just too blind).
The only evidence for "pad to 512 bytes" interpretation that I see in
the spec is "u8 data[][512];". Or have I missed something more
explicit?
Based on the Linux guest driver code and the lack of more evidence in
the spec, I'm pretty sure data[] doesn't need to be padded to 512 bytes
for discard/write zero requests.
> Looking at the QEMU sources, it seems like it can deal with both and
> always sets the status right behind the last byte:
>
> req->in = (void *)in_iov[in_num - 1].iov_base
> + in_iov[in_num - 1].iov_len
> - sizeof(struct virtio_blk_inhdr);
>
> Anyway, I think the virtio spec should be clearer here to avoid bad
> implementations in the future, so maybe Changpeng or Michael could
> update the spec here a little bit?
Yep, good point. VIRTIO 1.1 is available for public comments, so I've
CCed the list.
Stefan
> Thomas
>
>
> > [1](https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/blob/master/content.tex#L3944)
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stefano
> >
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-25 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-24 17:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/2] virtio-blk: add DISCARD and WRITE ZEROES features Stefano Garzarella
2019-01-24 17:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/2] " Stefano Garzarella
2019-01-24 17:55 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-01-24 18:31 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-01-25 14:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-01-25 16:18 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-01-27 12:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-01-28 8:28 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-01-24 17:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/2] tests/virtio-blk: add test for WRITE_ZEROES command Stefano Garzarella
2019-01-25 6:01 ` Thomas Huth
2019-01-25 6:07 ` Thomas Huth
2019-01-25 8:16 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-01-25 8:49 ` Thomas Huth
2019-01-25 11:58 ` Liu, Changpeng
2019-01-25 12:48 ` Thomas Huth
2019-01-25 19:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-25 15:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2019-01-25 19:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-27 12:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-01-27 18:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-30 7:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-01-30 7:59 ` Liu, Changpeng
2019-01-25 19:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-01-25 6:07 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190125151245.GD28305@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).