From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
dgilbert@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Fix invalidate_cache error path for parent activation
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:31:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190131143151.6146-1-kwolf@redhat.com> (raw)
bdrv_co_invalidate_cache() clears the BDRV_O_INACTIVE flag before
actually activating a node so that the correct permissions etc. are
taken. In case of errors, the flag must be restored so that the next
call to bdrv_co_invalidate_cache() retries activation.
Restoring the flag was missing in the error path for a failed
parent->role->activate() call. The consequence is that this attempt to
activate all images correctly fails because we still set errp, however
on the next attempt BDRV_O_INACTIVE is already clear, so we return
success without actually retrying the failed action.
An example where this is observable in practice is migration to a QEMU
instance that has a raw format block node attached to a guest device
with share-rw=off (the default) while another process holds
BLK_PERM_WRITE for the same image. In this case, all activation steps
before parent->role->activate() succeed because raw can tolerate other
writers to the image. Only the parent callback (in particular
blk_root_activate()) tries to implement the share-rw=on property and
requests exclusive write permissions. This fails when the migration
completes and correctly displays an error. However, a manual 'cont' will
incorrectly resume the VM without calling blk_root_activate() again.
This case is described in more detail in the following bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531888
Fix this by correctly restoring the BDRV_O_INACTIVE flag in the error
path.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
block.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index 0eba8ebe5c..7f5c9bb02b 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -4549,6 +4549,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_invalidate_cache(BlockDriverState *bs,
if (parent->role->activate) {
parent->role->activate(parent, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
+ bs->open_flags |= BDRV_O_INACTIVE;
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-31 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 14:31 Kevin Wolf [this message]
2019-02-01 5:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] block: Fix invalidate_cache error path for parent activation Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-02-01 9:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190131143151.6146-1-kwolf@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).