From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gs1yh-0002fI-Uh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 03:57:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gs1yh-0006yZ-22 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 03:57:43 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gs1yg-0006pr-FL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 03:57:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:57:20 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20190208095720.3d3f3cb4.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87d0o24u0s.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> References: <87d0o24u0s.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Maintainers, please git-am -m List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf , Thomas Huth , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Palmer Dabbelt , Richard Henderson , Max Filippov , Aleksandar Markovic , =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6k=?= Lureau , Anthony PERARD , Samuel Thibault , Alex =?UTF-8?B?QmVubsOp?= =?UTF-8?B?ZQ==?= , David Gibson On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 08:30:11 +0100 Markus Armbruster wrote: > Short story: please add >=20 > [am] > messageid =3D true >=20 > to your .gitconfig. >=20 > Long story. git-am can add a Message-id: tag. Looks like this: >=20 > commit 335dbb5de1e98c4dc73590349f17bb2a4d72596c > Author: Thomas Huth > Date: Mon Feb 4 09:25:43 2019 +0100 > Commit: Peter Maydell > CommitDate: Mon Feb 4 15:25:21 2019 +0000 >=20 > tests/docker/test-mingw and docs: Remove --with-sdlabi=3D2.0 >=20 > Patchew currently reports failures with the mingw docker test - t= his > is due to --with-sdlabi=3D2.0 configure flag which does not exist= anymore. > Remove this remainder from the docker test and the docs now. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 > Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 > Acked-by: Alex Benn=C3=A9e > ---> Message-id: 1549268743-18502-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com =20 > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell >=20 > The Message-id identifies the patch e-mail. It makes finding the review > thread easier and more reliable. It's also a valid key on Patchew[*]. I'm using it for anything I git am, but I'm usually not git am'ing my own patches (I just merge from the branch I have them on). Is the message id valuable enough to warrant the extra round-trip for patches that are committed by the authors themselves? [I can't say I've used it much myself, if at all.]