From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-2012 license statements
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:31:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211163102.0a99b023.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6de44209-a135-0894-5407-4f6af7a0965e@suse.de>
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:24:48 +0100
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> On 02/06/2019 02:02 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > On 06/02/2019 13:58, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:41:33 +0100
> >> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The license information in these files is rather confusing. The text
> >>> declares LGPL first, but then says that contributions after 2012 are
> >>> licensed under the GPL instead. How should the average user who just
> >>> downloaded the release tarball know which part is now GPL and which
> >>> is LGPL?
> >> FWIW, that statement was added in ccb084d3f0ec ("s390: new
> >> contributions GPLv2 or later").
> >>
> >>> Looking at the text of the LGPL (see COPYING.LIB in the top directory),
> >>> the license clearly states how this should be done instead:
> >>>
> >>> "3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public
> >>> License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. To do
> >>> this, you must alter all the notices that refer to this License, so
> >>> that they refer to the ordinary GNU General Public License, version 2,
> >>> instead of to this License."
> >> Hm. This talks about GPL v2, not GPL v2-or-later...
> >>
> >>> Thus let's clean up the confusing statements and use the proper GPL
> >>> text only.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> linux-user/s390x/target_cpu.h | 19 ++++++++-----------
> >>> target/s390x/cpu.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> >>> target/s390x/cpu.h | 19 ++++++++-----------
> >>> target/s390x/kvm.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> >> BTW: Is the original author of the code still around?
> > For the linux-user/s390x/target_cpu.h, it seems this code has been pushed by Alex Graf:
> >
> > commit 10ec51174ca69a4c3c5149b0b3baaa6ccba66273
> > Author: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
> > Date: Sat Dec 5 12:44:21 2009 +0100
> >
> > S/390 CPU fake emulation
> >
> > Because Qemu currently requires a TCG target to exist and there are quite some
> > useful helpers here to lay the groundwork for out KVM target, let's create a
> > stub TCG emulation target for S390X CPUs.
> >
> > This is required to make tcg happy. The emulation target itself won't work
> > though.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
> >
> > But the "(c) 2009 Ulrich Hecht" is confusing.
>
> Why? Ulrich was the one that started the port, I then cleaned it up,
> improved it, added system emulation and upstreamed it.
It's just a bit confusing that Ulrich does not show up in the sign-off
chain.
> What problem exactly are you trying to solve?
The confusing license statements?
I thought I'd ask whether the original author had any thoughts; if you
think this patch is problematic, I can dequeue it again.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-06 12:41 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-2012 license statements Thomas Huth
2019-02-06 12:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-06 13:02 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-02-11 15:24 ` Alexander Graf
2019-02-11 15:31 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-02-11 16:00 ` Alexander Graf
2019-02-11 16:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-06 13:09 ` Thomas Huth
2019-02-06 13:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-06 13:17 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-02-06 14:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Christian Borntraeger
2019-02-11 10:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211163102.0a99b023.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).